share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook AxoGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AXGN) Recent US$72m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook AxoGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AXGN) Recent US$72m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

机构投资者可能会忽略AxoGen, Inc.”s(纳斯达克股票代码:AXGN)由于长期收益保持乐观,最近市值下降了7200万美元
Simply Wall St ·  03/06 06:26

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies AxoGen's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着AxoGen的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前十名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

If you want to know who really controls AxoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXGN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 59% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着AxoGEN, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:AXGN),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为59%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$456m last week. However, the 11% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周该公司的市值跌至4.56亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,11%的股东一年回报率可能减轻了打击。但是,他们应该注意将来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AxoGen.

在下图中,我们放大了AxoGen的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AXGN Ownership Breakdown March 6th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:AXGN 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AxoGen?

关于AxoGen,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AxoGen. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AxoGen, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在AxoGen中拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下AxoGen过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AXGN Earnings and Revenue Growth March 6th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:AXGN 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 18% of AxoGen shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is ArrowMark Colorado Holdings, LLC with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Karen Zaderej is the owner of 2.5% of the company's shares.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。看来对冲基金拥有AxOgen18%的股份。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和活跃。许多人正在寻找推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是ArrowMark Colorado Holdings, LLC,其已发行股份为12%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的7.8%和6.6%。此外,首席执行官凯伦·扎德雷伊是该公司2.5%股份的所有者。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们做了进一步的挖掘,发现10位大股东约占登记册的50%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of AxoGen

AxoGen的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can see that insiders own shares in AxoGen, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$22m worth of the US$456m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有AxoGen, Inc.的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值4.56亿美元的公司价值2200万美元。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司18%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for AxoGen you should know about.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了两个你应该知道的AxoGen警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发