share_log

Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.'s (HKG:2255) Most Bullish Insider, Senior Key Executive Cheng Qu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 8.6% Gain

Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.'s (HKG:2255) Most Bullish Insider, Senior Key Executive Cheng Qu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 8.6% Gain

海昌海洋公园控股有限公司s (HKG: 2255) 最看涨的内幕人士,高级主要高管曲成一定对最近8.6%的涨幅感到满意
Simply Wall St ·  02/20 17:51

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 62% ownership
  • Institutions own 26% of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings
  • 从海昌海洋公园控股公司的庞大所有权来看,业内人士似乎对海昌海洋公园控股公司的增长有既得利益
  • 共有2名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,持有62%的所有权
  • 机构拥有海昌海洋公园控股公司26%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd. (HKG:2255) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看海昌海洋公园控股有限公司(HKG: 2255)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,个别内部人士拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为48%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$487m last week.

显然,上周该公司的市值上涨了4.87亿港元之后,内部人士受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings.

在下图中,我们放大了海昌海洋公园控股公司的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2255 Ownership Breakdown February 20th 2024
SEHK: 2255 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haichang Ocean Park Holdings?

机构所有权告诉我们关于海昌海洋公园控股的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者持有海昌海洋公园控股公司的大量股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看海昌海洋公园控股公司过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2255 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 20th 2024
SEHK: 2255 2024年2月20日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Haichang Ocean Park Holdings' case, its Senior Key Executive, Cheng Qu, is the largest shareholder, holding 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 3.4% of the stock.

对冲基金在海昌海洋公园控股的股份不多。因为行动胜于雄辩,所以我们认为当内部人士拥有公司的大量股份时,这是一个好兆头。就海昌海洋公园控股而言,其高级主要高管程曲是最大股东,持有48%的已发行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约15%和3.4%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 62% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细研究表明,两位大股东通过其62%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Haichang Ocean Park Holdings

海昌海洋公园控股的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Haichang Ocean Park Holdings Ltd.. Insiders own HK$3.0b worth of shares in the HK$6.2b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有海昌海洋公园控股有限公司的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家62亿港元公司价值30亿港元的股份。很高兴看到内部人士对这项业务进行如此投资。可能值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司26%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以使政策决定对他们有利,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发