share_log

Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002957) Last Week's 18% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002957) Last Week's 18% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

深圳科利柏科技有限公司's(SZSE:002957)上周的18%的跌幅一定让持有大量股份的私营公司感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 20:39

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Shenzhen Colibri Technologies' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 深圳Colibri Technologies拥有大量私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 共有2位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为55%
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

Every investor in Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002957) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 58% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

深圳科利柏科技股份有限公司(深圳证券交易所:002957)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为58%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.0b.

结果,在市值下降10亿元人民币之后,私营公司作为一个整体承受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen Colibri Technologies.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于深圳科利柏科技的什么。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002957 Ownership Breakdown February 7th 2024
SZSE: 002957 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Colibri Technologies?

关于深圳科利柏科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Shenzhen Colibri Technologies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shenzhen Colibri Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,深圳Colibri Technologies确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看深圳科利博科技的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002957 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 7th 2024
SZSE: 002957 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 7 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Colibri Technologies. Colibri Technologies Pte Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 39% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 17% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Shaodong Peng, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Vice Chairman.

对冲基金在深圳科利柏科技的股份不多。Colibri Technologies私人有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的39%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约17%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有8.1%的所有权。第三大股东彭少东也恰好拥有副董事长的头衔。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Colibri Technologies

深圳科利柏科技的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.7b, and insiders have CN¥392m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以报告,内部人士确实拥有深圳科利柏科技有限公司的股份。它的市值仅为47亿元人民币,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值3.92亿元人民币的股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shenzhen Colibri Technologies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

深圳科利柏科技拥有26%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对深圳科利柏科技有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 58%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的58%。仅从这一事实中很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过独立的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shenzhen Colibri Technologies .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在深圳科立博科技发现的两个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发