share_log

Fitell Corporation (NASDAQ:FTEL) Adds US$53m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 58% Stake in That Gain

Fitell Corporation (NASDAQ:FTEL) Adds US$53m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 58% Stake in That Gain

菲特尔公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FTEL)增加了5300万美元的市值,内部人士持有该收益58%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  05/09 10:20

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Fitell's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Jieting Zhao with a 58% stake
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Fitell拥有大量内部所有权,这表明公司扩张有固有的利益
  • 该公司的最大股东是赵杰庭,持有58%的股份
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

If you want to know who really controls Fitell Corporation (NASDAQ:FTEL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 58% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了菲特尔公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FTEL),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。个人内部人士持有58%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$104m market cap following a 73% gain in the stock.

结果,内部人士上周得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨73%后达到1.04亿美元。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Fitell.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Fitell的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:FTEL Ownership Breakdown May 9th 2024
纳斯达克公司:FTEL 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 9 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fitell?

关于Fitell,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们往往不会看到机构投资者持有风险很大、交易量稀少或规模很小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时会看到大公司没有注册机构,但这种情况并不特别常见。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Fitell's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司在股票登记处可能没有任何机构的原因有很多。如果流动性(每天交易的股票数量)低,机构可能很难购买大量股票。如果公司不需要筹集资金,机构可能缺乏建立立场的机会。或者,该公司的某些方面可能使机构投资者望而却步。Fitell的收益和收入记录(见下文)可能不会吸引机构投资者,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:FTEL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 9th 2024
纳斯达克公司:FTEL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 9 日

Fitell is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Jieting Zhao with 58% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 0.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.05% by the third-largest shareholder.

Fitell不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是赵杰庭,已发行股份的58%。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有多数权益控制权。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约0.1%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有0.05%的所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Fitell

Fitell 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Fitell Corporation. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own US$60m worth of shares in the US$104m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有菲特尔公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决定。这意味着他们拥有这家价值1.04亿美元的公司价值6000万美元的股份。这很有意义。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Fitell. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Fitell42%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Fitell (2 are a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了 Fitell 的 3 个警告信号(2 个有点令人担忧!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发