share_log

Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 74% of the Company

Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 74% of the Company

林肯国家公司(纽约证券交易所代码:LNC)主要由拥有公司74%股份的机构股东控制
Simply Wall St ·  04/21 09:08

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lincoln National's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,林肯国民的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 51% 的业务由前 21 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近买了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了林肯国家公司(纽约证券交易所代码:LNC),了解企业的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有74%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,将大量机构资金投资于公司通常被视为理想的特征。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lincoln National.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于林肯国民银行的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LNC Ownership Breakdown April 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:LNC 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln National?

关于林肯国民大学,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Lincoln National does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lincoln National's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,林肯国民银行确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看林肯国民的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LNC Earnings and Revenue Growth April 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:LNC收益和收入增长 2024年4月21日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lincoln National. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 9.6% and 3.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对林肯国民银行进行有意义的投资。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的13%。贝莱德公司和道富环球顾问公司分别拥有9.6%和3.8%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记处,我们可以看到,51%的所有权由前21名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东在所有权中拥有多数股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Lincoln National

林肯国家集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lincoln National Corporation. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$34m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有林肯国家公司不到1%的股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值3400万美元的股票。看到董事会成员拥有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lincoln National. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有25%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对林肯国民银行有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Lincoln National , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向林肯国民银行确定了一个警告信号,我们知道它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发