share_log

Institutional Investors in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWD) Lost 8.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWD) Lost 8.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:CRWD)的机构投资者上周下跌了8.5%,但已经从长期增长中受益
Simply Wall St ·  04/20 08:21

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CrowdStrike Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 44% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着CrowdStrike Holdings的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前25名股东拥有公司44%的股份
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

Every investor in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:CRWD)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为73%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$68b last week. However, the 114% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上周该公司的市值跌至680亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,114%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CrowdStrike Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究CrowdStrike Holdings的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CRWD Ownership Breakdown April 20th 2024
纳斯达克GS:CRWD 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CrowdStrike Holdings?

关于CrowdStrike控股公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CrowdStrike Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CrowdStrike Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在CrowdStrike Holdings中拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到CrowdStrike Holdings的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CRWD Earnings and Revenue Growth April 20th 2024
纳斯达克GS:CRWD 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 20 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CrowdStrike Holdings. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.0% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. George Kurtz, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对CrowdStrike Holdings进行有意义的投资。贝莱德公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的7.0%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的6.5%和3.3%。第三大股东乔治·库尔茨也恰好拥有董事会成员的头衔。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of CrowdStrike Holdings

众筹控股的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. Insiders own US$2.9b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.的股份。内部人士拥有价值29亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会对他们是买入还是卖出感兴趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CrowdStrike Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

CrowdStrike Holdings拥有23%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对CrowdStrike Holdings有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for CrowdStrike Holdings you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了两个你应该知道的CrowdStrike Holdings警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发