share_log

Myers Industries (NYSE:MYE) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Myers Industries (NYSE:MYE) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

迈尔斯工业(纽约证券交易所代码:MYE)似乎非常明智地使用债务
Simply Wall St ·  03/28 08:49

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Myers Industries, Inc. (NYSE:MYE) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

沃伦·巴菲特曾说过一句名言:“波动性远非风险的代名词。”当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢考虑其债务的用途,因为债务过载可能导致破产。与许多其他公司一样,迈尔斯工业公司(纽约证券交易所代码:MYE)也使用债务。但更重要的问题是:债务创造了多大的风险?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

债务可以帮助企业,直到企业难以偿还债务,无论是新资本还是自由现金流。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以控制业务。但是,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司为了控制债务,必须以低廉的股价稀释股东。当然,许多公司使用债务为增长提供资金,而不会产生任何负面影响。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,要做的第一件事是同时考虑其现金和债务。

What Is Myers Industries's Net Debt?

迈尔斯工业的净负债是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Myers Industries had debt of US$58.0m at the end of December 2023, a reduction from US$94.0m over a year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$30.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$27.7m.

您可以点击下图查看更多详情,该图片显示,截至2023年12月底,迈尔斯工业的债务为5,800万美元,较上一年的940万美元有所减少。但是,由于其现金储备为3030万美元,其净负债较少,约为2770万美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MYE Debt to Equity History March 28th 2024
纽约证券交易所:MYE 债务与股本比率历史记录 2024 年 3 月 28 日

A Look At Myers Industries' Liabilities

看看迈尔斯工业的负债

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Myers Industries had liabilities of US$165.1m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$83.7m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$30.3m and US$128.6m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$89.9m.

我们可以从最新的资产负债表中看出,迈尔斯工业的负债为1.651亿美元,一年后到期的负债为8,370万美元。另一方面,它有3030万美元的现金和价值1.286亿美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总额8,990万美元。

Given Myers Industries has a market capitalization of US$856.1m, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

鉴于迈尔斯工业的市值为8.561亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成很大的威胁。但是,我们确实认为值得关注其资产负债表的实力,因为它可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了扩大公司相对于收益的负债规模,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),将其利息和税前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。因此,我们将债务与收益的关系考虑在内,包括和不包括折旧和摊销费用。

Myers Industries has net debt of just 0.33 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 9.8 times the interest expense over the last year. It is just as well that Myers Industries's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 26% over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Myers Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

迈尔斯工业的净负债仅为息税折旧摊销前利润的0.33倍,这表明它当然不是鲁莽的借款人。这一观点得到了稳健的利息覆盖范围的支持,息税前利润是去年利息支出的9.8倍。迈尔斯工业的负荷也不是太重,因为其息税前利润比去年下降了26%。在还清债务方面,收入下降对健康的作用并不比含糖的苏打水更有用。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定迈尔斯工业能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Myers Industries recorded free cash flow worth 71% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最后,公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,不能用会计利润偿还债务。因此,我们总是检查息税前利润中有多少转化为自由现金流。在最近三年中,鉴于自由现金流不包括利息和税收,迈尔斯工业公司的自由现金流占其息税前利润的71%,这几乎是正常的。这种自由现金流使公司处于有利地位,可以在适当的时候偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Myers Industries's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, is pretty flash. Considering this range of data points, we think Myers Industries is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Myers Industries, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

尽管我们考虑的其他因素要好得多,但根据这项分析,迈尔斯工业的息税前利润增长率确实为负数。毫无疑问,根据息税折旧摊销前利润,其处理债务的能力相当闪烁。考虑到这一系列数据点,我们认为迈尔斯工业完全有能力管理其债务水平。但要谨慎一点:我们认为债务水平足够高,足以证明持续监测是合理的。随着时间的推移,股价往往会跟随每股收益,因此,如果你对迈尔斯工业感兴趣,你很可能想点击这里查看其每股收益历史的互动图表。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

当一切都说完之后,有时更容易将注意力集中在甚至不需要债务的公司上。读者现在可以100%免费访问净负债为零的成长型股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发