share_log

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's (NYSE:AGM) Institutional Investors Lost 4.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's (NYSE:AGM) Institutional Investors Lost 4.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

联邦农业抵押贷款公司(纽约证券交易所代码:AGM)的机构投资者上周下跌了4.0%,但受益于长期涨势
Simply Wall St ·  02/27 09:35

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Federal Agricultural Mortgage's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于各机构持有该股的大量股份,联邦农业抵押贷款的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有20名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

Every investor in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

联邦农业抵押贷款公司(纽约证券交易所代码:AGM)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为70%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.9b last week. However, the 29% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周该公司的市值跌至19亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,29%的股东一年回报率可能减轻了打击。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Federal Agricultural Mortgage.

在下图中,我们放大了联邦农业抵押贷款的不同所有权类别。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AGM Ownership Breakdown February 27th 2024
纽约证券交易所:股东大会所有权明细 2024年2月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federal Agricultural Mortgage?

关于联邦农业抵押贷款,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Federal Agricultural Mortgage does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Federal Agricultural Mortgage's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,联邦农业抵押贷款确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到联邦农业抵押贷款的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AGM Earnings and Revenue Growth February 27th 2024
纽约证券交易所:股东周年大会收益和收入增长 2024年2月27日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 8.0% of shares outstanding. With 6.1% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, FMR LLC and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。对冲基金在联邦农业抵押贷款中的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是贝莱德公司,其已发行股票的8.0%。FMR LLC和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分别占已发行股份的6.1%和5.5%,是第二和第三大股东。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记处来看,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前20名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东在所有权中拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Federal Agricultural Mortgage

联邦农业抵押贷款的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$25m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有联邦农业抵押贷款公司的股份。内部人士持有价值2500万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有联邦农业抵押贷款29%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Federal Agricultural Mortgage , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经确定了联邦农业抵押贷款的1个警告信号,我们知道它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发