share_log

Institutional Investors in LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC) Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC) Lost 5.1% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

LendingClub Corporation(纽约证券交易所代码:LC)的机构投资者上周下跌了5.1%,但已经从长期增长中受益
Simply Wall St ·  05/25 08:16

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in LendingClub implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构在LendingClub中的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有15名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

Every investor in LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

LendingClub Corporation(纽约证券交易所代码:LC)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为77%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 5.1% in value last week. However, the 11% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降5.1%的机构投资者。但是,11%的一年期回报率可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但是他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of LendingClub.

在下图中,我们放大了LendingClub的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LC Ownership Breakdown May 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LC 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LendingClub?

关于LendingClub,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in LendingClub. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see LendingClub's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在LendingClub中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到LendingClub的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 25th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LC 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 25 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. LendingClub is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Scott Sanborn, the CEO has 1.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。LendingClub 不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有权为10%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的7.5%和6.2%。此外,我们发现首席执行官斯科特·桑伯恩以其名义分配了1.3%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前15名股东的合并所有权为51%,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of LendingClub

LendingClub 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in LendingClub Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$31m worth of the US$998m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有LendingClub Corporation的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值9.98亿美元的公司价值3100万美元。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司20%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for LendingClub you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现了两个你应该知道的LendingClub警告信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发