share_log

With EPS Growth And More, Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) Makes An Interesting Case

With EPS Growth And More, Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) Makes An Interesting Case

随着每股收益的增长及更多,Snap-on(纽约证券交易所代码:SNA)是一个有趣的案例
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 06:26

It's common for many investors, especially those who are inexperienced, to buy shares in companies with a good story even if these companies are loss-making. Unfortunately, these high risk investments often have little probability of ever paying off, and many investors pay a price to learn their lesson. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad.

许多投资者,尤其是那些没有经验的投资者,通常会购买有好故事的公司的股票,即使这些公司亏损。不幸的是,这些高风险投资通常几乎不可能获得回报,许多投资者为吸取教训付出了代价。亏损的公司可以像海绵一样争夺资本,因此投资者应谨慎行事,不要一笔又一笔地投入好钱。

If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Snap-on (NYSE:SNA). While this doesn't necessarily speak to whether it's undervalued, the profitability of the business is enough to warrant some appreciation - especially if its growing.

如果这种公司不是你的风格,你喜欢那些创造收入甚至赚取利润的公司,那么你很可能会对Snap-on(纽约证券交易所代码:SNA)感兴趣。尽管这并不一定说明其估值是否被低估,但该业务的盈利能力足以保证一定的升值——尤其是在其增长的情况下。

How Fast Is Snap-on Growing?

Snap-on 的增长速度有多快?

The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term, so you'd expect share price to follow earnings per share (EPS) outcomes eventually. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. We can see that in the last three years Snap-on grew its EPS by 16% per year. That growth rate is fairly good, assuming the company can keep it up.

市场在短期内是投票机,但从长远来看是一台权衡器,因此您预计股价最终将跟随每股收益(EPS)的结果。这使得每股收益的增长对任何公司来说都是一种有吸引力的品质。我们可以看到,在过去三年中,Snap-on的每股收益每年增长16%。假设公司能够保持增长率,那么这个增长率相当不错。

Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Our analysis has highlighted that Snap-on's revenue from operations did not account for all of their revenue in the previous 12 months, so our analysis of its margins might not accurately reflect the underlying business. EBIT margins for Snap-on remained fairly unchanged over the last year, however the company should be pleased to report its revenue growth for the period of 3.7% to US$5.1b. That's progress.

仔细考虑收入增长和息税前收益(EBIT)利润率有助于为近期利润增长的可持续性提供信息。我们的分析突出表明,Snap-on的收入 来自运营 没有考虑到他们在过去12个月中的所有收入,因此我们对其利润率的分析可能无法准确反映基础业务。去年,Snap-on的息税前利润率基本保持不变,但该公司应该乐于报告其收入增长3.7%至51亿美元。这就是进步。

You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers.

您可以在下表中查看该公司的收入和收益增长趋势。点击图表查看确切的数字。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NYSE:SNA Earnings and Revenue History May 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SNA 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 5 月 24 日

While we live in the present moment, there's little doubt that the future matters most in the investment decision process. So why not check this interactive chart depicting future EPS estimates, for Snap-on?

虽然我们生活在当下,但毫无疑问,未来在投资决策过程中最重要。那么,为什么不查看这张描绘Snap-on未来每股收益估计值的交互式图表呢?

Are Snap-on Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?

Snap-on内部人士是否与所有股东保持一致?

We would not expect to see insiders owning a large percentage of a US$15b company like Snap-on. But thanks to their investment in the company, it's pleasing to see that there are still incentives to align their actions with the shareholders. We note that their impressive stake in the company is worth US$294m. This suggests that leadership will be very mindful of shareholders' interests when making decisions!

我们预计不会看到内部人士拥有像Snap-on这样的150亿美元公司的很大一部分股份。但是,由于他们对公司的投资,令人高兴的是,仍然有激励措施使他们的行动与股东保持一致。我们注意到,他们在该公司的可观股份价值2.94亿美元。这表明领导层在做出决策时会非常注意股东的利益!

It means a lot to see insiders invested in the business, but shareholders may be wondering if remuneration policies are in their best interest. A brief analysis of the CEO compensation suggests they are. For companies with market capitalisations over US$8.0b, like Snap-on, the median CEO pay is around US$14m.

看到内部人士投资该业务意义重大,但股东们可能想知道薪酬政策是否符合他们的最大利益。对首席执行官薪酬的简要分析表明确实如此。对于市值超过80亿美元的公司,例如Snap-on,首席执行官的薪酬中位数约为1400万美元。

The Snap-on CEO received US$11m in compensation for the year ending December 2023. That seems pretty reasonable, especially given it's below the median for similar sized companies. CEO remuneration levels are not the most important metric for investors, but when the pay is modest, that does support enhanced alignment between the CEO and the ordinary shareholders. Generally, arguments can be made that reasonable pay levels attest to good decision-making.

这位Snap-on首席执行官在截至2023年12月的年度中获得了1100万美元的薪酬。这似乎很合理,特别是考虑到它低于类似规模公司的中位数。首席执行官薪酬水平并不是投资者最重要的指标,但是当薪酬适度时,这确实支持加强首席执行官与普通股东之间的协调。通常,可以说合理的薪酬水平证明了良好的决策。

Does Snap-on Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?

Snap-on 值得在您的关注清单上占有一席之地吗?

One important encouraging feature of Snap-on is that it is growing profits. The fact that EPS is growing is a genuine positive for Snap-on, but the pleasant picture gets better than that. Boasting both modest CEO pay and considerable insider ownership, you'd argue this one is worthy of the watchlist, at least. Of course, identifying quality businesses is only half the battle; investors need to know whether the stock is undervalued. So you might want to consider this free discounted cashflow valuation of Snap-on.

Snap-on的一个重要令人鼓舞的特点是利润不断增长。每股收益的增长对Snap-on来说确实是一个积极因素,但令人愉快的画面比这更好。你可能会认为这位首席执行官薪酬不高,内部所有权相当可观,至少值得列入关注名单。当然,确定优质企业只是成功的一半;投资者需要知道股票的估值是否被低估。因此,你可能需要考虑Snap-on的这种免费折扣现金流估值。

Although Snap-on certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing.

尽管Snap-on看起来确实不错,但如果内部人士买入股票,它可能会吸引更多的投资者。如果你想看到拥有更多风险的公司,那么看看这些精心挑选的公司,这些公司不仅拥有强劲的增长,而且有强大的内部支持。

Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.

请注意,本文中讨论的内幕交易是指相关司法管辖区内应报告的交易。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发