share_log

We Think Leggett & Platt (NYSE:LEG) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

We Think Leggett & Platt (NYSE:LEG) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

我们认为 Leggett & Platt(纽约证券交易所代码:LEG)正在为债务承担一些风险
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 09:23

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE:LEG) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

大卫·伊本说得好,他说:“波动性不是我们关心的风险。我们关心的是避免资本的永久损失。”当你检查公司的资产负债表的风险时,考虑它的资产负债表是很自然的,因为企业倒闭时通常会涉及债务。重要的是,Leggett & Platt, Incorporated(纽约证券交易所代码:LEG)确实有债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务会带来多大的风险?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

一般而言,只有当公司无法通过筹集资金或用自己的现金流轻松还清债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能会一无所获。但是,更频繁(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东,以支撑其资产负债表。当然,债务的好处在于它通常代表廉价资本,尤其是当它以高回报率进行再投资的能力取代公司的稀释时。当我们检查债务水平时,我们首先要同时考虑现金和债务水平。

What Is Leggett & Platt's Debt?

什么是莱格特和普拉特的债务?

As you can see below, Leggett & Platt had US$2.08b of debt, at March 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$361.3m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.72b.

如下所示,截至2024年3月,莱格特和普拉特的债务为20.8亿美元,与前一年大致相同。您可以单击图表以获取更多详细信息。但是,它也有3.613亿美元的现金,因此其净负债为17.2亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:LEG Debt to Equity History May 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:LEG 债务与股权比率历史记录 2024 年 5 月 21 日

A Look At Leggett & Platt's Liabilities

看看 Leggett & Platt 的负债

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Leggett & Platt had liabilities of US$1.19b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.14b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$361.3m and US$635.1m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$2.33b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

我们可以从最新的资产负债表中看出,Leggett & Platt的负债为11.9亿美元,一年后到期的负债为21.4亿美元。另一方面,它有3.613亿美元的现金和价值6.351亿美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和高出23.3亿美元。

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$1.62b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

当你考虑到这一缺口超过了公司16.2亿美元的市值时,你很可能会倾向于仔细审查资产负债表。在公司必须迅速清理资产负债表的情况下,股东似乎可能会遭受大规模稀释。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我们通过以下方法来衡量公司的债务负担与其盈利能力:将其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),并计算其利息和税前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的难易程度。这种方法的优势在于,我们既考虑了债务的绝对数量(包括净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润),也考虑了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(及其利息覆盖率)。

Leggett & Platt has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.7 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.6 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Worse, Leggett & Platt's EBIT was down 30% over the last year. If earnings continue to follow that trajectory, paying off that debt load will be harder than convincing us to run a marathon in the rain. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Leggett & Platt can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Leggett & Platt的债务与息税折旧摊销前利润的比率为3.7,其息税前利润覆盖了利息支出的3.6倍。综上所述,这意味着,尽管我们不希望债务水平上升,但我们认为它可以承受目前的杠杆率。更糟糕的是,莱格特和普拉特的息税前利润比去年下降了30%。如果收益继续保持这一轨迹,那么偿还债务负担将比说服我们在雨中跑一场马拉松更难。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识最多。但最终,该业务未来的盈利能力将决定Leggett & Platt能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Leggett & Platt produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 69% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,不能用会计利润偿还债务。因此,合乎逻辑的步骤是研究息税前利润与实际自由现金流相匹配的比例。在过去三年中,Leggett & Platt产生了稳健的自由现金流,相当于其息税前利润的69%,与我们的预期差不多。这种冷硬现金意味着它可以在需要时减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

On the face of it, Leggett & Platt's level of total liabilities left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. We're quite clear that we consider Leggett & Platt to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Leggett & Platt is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...

从表面上看,Leggett & Platt的总负债水平使我们对该股持初步态度,其息税前利润增长率并不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空荡荡的餐厅更具吸引力。但至少在将息税前利润转换为自由现金流方面相当不错;这令人鼓舞。我们很清楚,由于Leggett & Platt的资产负债表状况良好,我们认为Leggett & Platt的风险确实相当大。因此,我们对这只鱼的警惕几乎就像一只饥饿的小猫要掉进主人的鱼池一样警惕:正如他们所说,一旦被咬伤,两次害羞。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识最多。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。请注意,Leggett & Platt在我们的投资分析中显示了2个警告信号,其中一个与之有关...

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

当一切都说完之后,有时更容易将注意力集中在甚至不需要债务的公司上。读者现在可以100%免费访问净负债为零的成长型股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发