share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018) Insiders Who Own 42% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018) Insiders Who Own 42% of the Company

最近的回调一定让拥有该公司42%股份的瑞声科技控股有限公司(HKG: 2018)内部人士感到沮丧
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 01:40

Key Insights

关键见解

  • AAC Technologies Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in AAC Technologies Holdings is 27%
  • 瑞声科技控股公司拥有大量内部所有权,表明公司扩张有固有的利益
  • 共有3位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 瑞声科技控股的机构所有权为27%

If you want to know who really controls AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了瑞声科技控股有限公司(HKG: 2018),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,个别内部人士拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为42%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

And following last week's 13% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

继上周股价下跌13%之后,内部人士遭受的损失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AAC Technologies Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究瑞声科技控股公司的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2018 Ownership Breakdown May 21st 2024
香港交易所:2018 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AAC Technologies Holdings?

关于瑞声科技控股公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AAC Technologies Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AAC Technologies Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者持有瑞声科技控股公司的大量股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看瑞声科技控股公司过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2018 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 21st 2024
香港交易所:2018 年收益及收入增长 2024 年 5 月 21 日

AAC Technologies Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Chun Yuan Wu is currently the largest shareholder, with 22% of shares outstanding. With 20% and 9.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Zhengmin Pan and JPMorgan Chase & Co, Private Banking and Investment Banking Investments are the second and third largest shareholders. Zhengmin Pan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

瑞声科技控股公司不归对冲基金所有。吴春元目前是最大股东,已发行股份的22%。潘正民和摩根大通、私人银行和投资银行投资分别拥有20%和9.3%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。第二大股东潘正敏也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前三名股东通过其51%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of AAC Technologies Holdings

瑞声科技控股公司的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$12b stake in this HK$29b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

内部人士似乎拥有瑞声科技控股公司的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项290亿港元的业务中拥有120亿港元的大量股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AAC Technologies Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

瑞声科技控股拥有31%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对瑞声科技控股有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AAC Technologies Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with AAC Technologies Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解瑞声科技控股公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向瑞声科技控股公司发现了一个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发