share_log

With 82% Ownership, Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 82% Ownership, Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

Salesforce, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:CRM)拥有 82% 的所有权,拥有强大的机构支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 08:39

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Salesforce's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高机构所有权意味着Salesforce的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有25名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

If you want to know who really controls Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Salesforce, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:CRM),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为82%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,投资于公司的机构资金中有很大一部分通常是对公司未来的巨大信任票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Salesforce, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Salesforce的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CRM Ownership Breakdown May 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:CRM 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Salesforce?

关于Salesforce,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Salesforce does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Salesforce's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Salesforce确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Salesforce的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CRM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:CRM 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 13 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Salesforce. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.6% of shares outstanding. With 7.5% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Marc Benioff, the CEO has 2.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Salesforce进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已发行股份为8.6%。贝莱德公司和道富环球顾问公司分别拥有7.5%和4.7%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。此外,我们发现首席执行官马克·贝尼奥夫以其名义分配了2.3%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现25位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Salesforce

Salesforce 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Salesforce, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$7.2b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Salesforce, Inc.的部分股份。它是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员共拥有价值72亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Salesforce. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有15%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Salesforce有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Salesforce better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Salesforce .

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Salesforce,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该注意我们在Salesforce中发现的两个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发