share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:SCRM) With 82% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:SCRM) With 82% Ownership

机构投资者对拥有82%所有权的Screaming Eagle收购公司(纳斯达克股票代码:SCRM)深感信心
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 11:14

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Screaming Eagle Acquisition's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高机构所有权意味着 Screaming Eagle Acquisition 的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有9名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有52%的所有权
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

If you want to know who really controls Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:SCRM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp.(纳斯达克股票代码:SCRM),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为82%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Last week's 17% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 14%.

上周17%的涨幅意味着,尽管该公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。上周的涨势将进一步提振目前为14%的股东一年回报率。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Screaming Eagle Acquisition.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Screaming Eagle收购的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:SCRM Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车:SCRM 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Screaming Eagle Acquisition?

关于收购 Screaming Eagle,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Screaming Eagle Acquisition. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Screaming Eagle Acquisition, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者在《尖鹰收购》中拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看收购Screaming Eagle过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:SCRM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车:SCRM 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 7.8% of Screaming Eagle Acquisition. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Eagle Equity Partners, LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.8% and 6.5% of the stock.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。我们的数据显示,对冲基金拥有 Screaming Eagle 收购的 7.8% 的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。Eagle Equity Partners, LLC目前是最大股东,已发行20%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.8%和6.5%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前9名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Screaming Eagle Acquisition

收购 Screaming Eagle 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我们的数据无法证实董事会成员亲自持有股份。鉴于我们没有获得内部所有权,我们可能缺少数据。因此,在这里评估首席执行官的薪酬和任期会很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Screaming Eagle Acquisition. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有《尖鹰收购》10%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Screaming Eagle Acquisition better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Screaming Eagle Acquisition is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地理解 Screaming Eagle 的收购,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,Screaming Eagle的收购显示了两个警告信号,你应该知道...

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发