share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 42% of BRC Inc. (NYSE:BRCC) Gained 51%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 42% of BRC Inc. (NYSE:BRCC) Gained 51%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有BRC Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:BRCC)42%股份的个人投资者上涨了51%,机构也获利
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 10:57

Key Insights

关键见解

  • BRC's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 14 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Institutions own 35% of BRC
  • BRC拥有大量的个人投资者所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
  • 前14名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 机构拥有 BRC 35% 的股份

If you want to know who really controls BRC Inc. (NYSE:BRCC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 42% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着BRC Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:BRCC),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。个人投资者拥有42%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$125m market cap gain, institutions too had a 35% share in those profits.

尽管个人投资者是上周1.25亿美元市值增长中受益最大的群体,但机构在这些利润中也占有35%的份额。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about BRC.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于BRC的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BRCC Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
纽约证券交易所:BRCC 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BRC?

关于BRC,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

BRC already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at BRC's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

BRC已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看BRC的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BRCC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
纽约证券交易所:BRCC收益和收入增长 2024年5月10日

It would appear that 19% of BRC shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Engaged Capital, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

看来BRC的19%的股票是由对冲基金控制的。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。Engaged Capital, LLC目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为19%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约6.3%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有4.5%的所有权。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前14名股东的总所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of BRC

BRC 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in BRC Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$901m, and insiders have US$33m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有BRC Inc.的股份。它的市值仅为9.01亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值3300万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 42% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over BRC. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有42%的所有权的公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对BRC有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand BRC better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for BRC that you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解BRC,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了您应该注意的3个BRC警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发