share_log

Chimera Investment Corporation's (NYSE:CIM) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 9.8% Gain Last Week

Chimera Investment Corporation's (NYSE:CIM) Institutional Shareholders Had a Great Week as One-year Returns Increased After a 9.8% Gain Last Week

奇美拉投资公司(纽约证券交易所代码:CIM)的机构股东度过了愉快的一周,一年期回报率在上周上涨9.8%之后有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 06:06

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Chimera Investment's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高机构所有权意味着奇美拉投资的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 42% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
  • 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Chimera Investment Corporation (NYSE:CIM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 50% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着奇美拉投资公司(纽约证券交易所代码:CIM),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有50%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$101m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 5.4% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上周该公司的市值上涨了1.01亿美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。目前,一年股东回报率为5.4%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Chimera Investment, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Chimera Investment的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CIM Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
纽约证券交易所:CIM 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chimera Investment?

关于奇美拉投资,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Chimera Investment already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chimera Investment, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

奇美拉投资已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下奇美拉投资过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CIM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
纽约证券交易所:CIM 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chimera Investment. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

对冲基金在奇美拉投资的股份不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为9.4%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.7%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有6.2%的所有权。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现25位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Chimera Investment

奇美拉投资的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Chimera Investment Corporation. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$8.3m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有奇美拉投资公司不到1%的股份。这是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立一致。在本案中,内部人士拥有价值830万美元的股票。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司49%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Chimera Investment (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了 Chimera Investment 的 3 个警告信号(1 个有点令人担忧!)在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发