share_log

After Losing 4.8% in the Past Year, Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 4.8% in the Past Year, Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

丘吉尔唐斯公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CHDN)在过去一年中下跌了4.8%之后,最近的涨势必须让机构所有者松一口气
Simply Wall St ·  05/09 12:35

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Churchill Downs implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 机构持有丘吉尔唐斯的大量股权意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
  • 前9名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 内部人士最近的购买

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Churchill Downs Incorporated (NASDAQ:CHDN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了丘吉尔唐斯公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CHDN),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为79%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 7.1% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 4.8%.

机构投资者将对上周股价上涨7.1%表示赞赏,因为他们一年的亏损总额为4.8%,令人失望。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Churchill Downs.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于丘吉尔唐斯的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CHDN Ownership Breakdown May 9th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:CHDN 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Churchill Downs?

关于丘吉尔唐斯,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Churchill Downs does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Churchill Downs, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,丘吉尔唐斯确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看丘吉尔唐斯过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CHDN Earnings and Revenue Growth May 9th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:CHDN 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 9 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Churchill Downs. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 8.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO William Carstanjen is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。对冲基金在丘吉尔唐斯的股票不多。我们的数据显示,资本研究与管理公司是最大股东,已发行股份的13%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和贝莱德公司分别拥有9.2%和8.3%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。此外,首席执行官威廉·卡斯坦詹是该公司2.0%股份的所有者。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前9名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Churchill Downs

丘吉尔唐斯的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Churchill Downs Incorporated. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$361m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有丘吉尔唐斯公司的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员共拥有价值3.61亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会对他们是买入还是卖出感兴趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Churchill Downs. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

丘吉尔唐斯拥有12%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众在一定程度上对丘吉尔唐斯有影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.7%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司5.7%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Churchill Downs (1 is a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们已经确定了丘吉尔唐斯的 2 个警告标志(1 个有点不愉快),你应该注意这些标志。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发