share_log

Institutional Investors Are D.R. Horton, Inc.'s (NYSE:DHI) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$2.9b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are D.R. Horton, Inc.'s (NYSE:DHI) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$2.9b Market Cap Gain

机构投资者是 D.R. Horton, Inc.s(纽约证券交易所代码:DHI)最大的博彩玩家在上周市值增长29亿美元后获得了奖励
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 06:23

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, D.R. Horton's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,D.R. Horton的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 前16名股东拥有公司51%的股份
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

To get a sense of who is truly in control of D.R. Horton, Inc. (NYSE:DHI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了D.R. Horton, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:DHI),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为86%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$2.9b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 40% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

在上周该公司的市值上涨了29亿美元之后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。目前,一年的投资回报率为40%,上周的收益本来会非常受欢迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about D.R. Horton.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于D.R. Horton的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DHI Ownership Breakdown May 8th 2024
纽约证券交易所:DHI 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About D.R. Horton?

关于D.R. Horton,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in D.R. Horton. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at D.R. Horton's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者持有D.R. Horton的大量股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看D.R. Horton的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DHI Earnings and Revenue Growth May 8th 2024
纽约证券交易所:DHI 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 8 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. D.R. Horton is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。D.R. Horton 不归对冲基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为11%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的10%和9.4%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前16名股东的合并所有权为51%,这意味着没有一个单一股东拥有多数股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of D.R. Horton

D.R. Horton 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in D.R. Horton, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$1.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有D.R. Horton, Inc.的股份。它是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员共拥有价值11亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司12%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with D.R. Horton .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在 D.R. Horton 身上发现的 1 个警告信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发