share_log

Schlumberger Limited's (NYSE:SLB) Market Cap Decline of US$3.0b May Not Have as Much of an Impact on Institutional Owners After a Year of 4.9% Returns

Schlumberger Limited's (NYSE:SLB) Market Cap Decline of US$3.0b May Not Have as Much of an Impact on Institutional Owners After a Year of 4.9% Returns

斯伦贝谢有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:SLB)市值下降30亿美元,在回报率为4.9%的一年之后,对机构所有者的影响可能不会那么大
Simply Wall St ·  05/01 09:57

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Schlumberger implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构持有斯伦贝谢的大量股权意味着它们对该公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 50% 的业务由前 17 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

Every investor in Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:SLB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 85% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

斯伦贝谢有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:SLB)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有85%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$68b last week. However, the 4.9% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周该公司的市值跌至680亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,4.9%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Schlumberger.

在下图中,我们放大了斯伦贝谢的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SLB Ownership Breakdown May 1st 2024
纽约证券交易所:SLB 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Schlumberger?

关于斯伦贝谢,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Schlumberger does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Schlumberger's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,斯伦贝谢确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到斯伦贝谢的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SLB Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2024
纽约证券交易所:SLB收益和收入增长 2024年5月1日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Schlumberger. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.6% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.9% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对斯伦贝谢进行有意义的投资。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份为9.3%。贝莱德公司是第二大股东,拥有7.6%的普通股,道富环球顾问公司持有该公司约5.9%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前17名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Schlumberger

斯伦贝谢的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Schlumberger Limited. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$162m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有斯伦贝谢有限公司不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值1.62亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到董事会成员拥有股票,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Schlumberger. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有斯伦贝谢15%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Schlumberger that you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了斯伦贝谢的3个警告信号,你应该注意这些信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发