share_log

Olin Corporation (NYSE:OLN) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company

Olin Corporation (NYSE:OLN) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company

奥林公司(纽约证券交易所代码:OLN)受到持有公司89%股份的机构所有者的青睐
Simply Wall St ·  04/29 06:33

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Olin implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构对奥林的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
  • 共有9名投资者拥有该公司的多数股权,拥有51%的所有权
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

If you want to know who really controls Olin Corporation (NYSE:OLN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着奥林公司(纽约证券交易所代码:OLN),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为89%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Olin.

在下图中,我们放大了奥林的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:OLN Ownership Breakdown April 29th 2024
纽约证券交易所:OLN 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Olin?

关于奥林,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Olin does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Olin's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,奥林确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看奥林的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:OLN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 29th 2024
纽约证券交易所:OLN收益和收入增长 2024年4月29日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Olin. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.8% and 8.3% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。对冲基金在奥林的股票不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已发行股份的10%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.8%和8.3%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Olin

奥林的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Olin Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$31m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有奥林公司不到1%的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员有可能在不拥有太多比例权益的情况下拥有该公司的有意义的权益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约3100万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司10%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Olin better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Olin that you should be aware of before investing here.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解奥林,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了奥林的3个警告信号,在这里投资之前,你应该注意这些信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发