share_log

Here's Why Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Here's Why Gogo (NASDAQ:GOGO) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

这就是Gogo(纳斯达克股票代码:GOGO)的债务负担沉重的原因
Simply Wall St ·  04/26 09:40

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Gogo Inc. (NASDAQ:GOGO) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

沃伦·巴菲特曾说过一句名言:“波动性远非风险的代名词。”当你检查公司的资产负债表的风险时,考虑它的资产负债表是很自然的,因为企业倒闭时通常会涉及债务。我们可以看到,Gogo Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:GOGO)确实在其业务中使用了债务。但是这笔债务是股东关心的问题吗?

When Is Debt A Problem?

债务何时会成为问题?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

当企业无法通过自由现金流或以诱人的价格筹集资金来轻松履行这些义务时,债务和其他负债就会变得有风险。资本主义的重要组成部分是 “创造性破坏” 过程,在这种过程中,倒闭的企业被银行家无情地清算。但是,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东才能控制债务。话虽如此,最常见的情况是公司合理地很好地管理债务,而且有利于自己的利益。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,要做的第一件事就是综合考虑其现金和债务。

What Is Gogo's Debt?

Gogo的债务是什么?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Gogo had debt of US$594.8m at the end of December 2023, a reduction from US$697.4m over a year. However, it does have US$162.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$432.5m.

您可以点击下图以获取更多详细信息,该图片显示,截至2023年12月底,Gogo的债务为5.948亿美元,较去年同期的6.974亿美元有所减少。但是,它确实有1.623亿美元的现金抵消了这一点,净负债约为4.325亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:GOGO Debt to Equity History April 26th 2024
NASDAQGS: GOGO债券与股本的比率历史记录 2024年4月26日

How Strong Is Gogo's Balance Sheet?

Gogo的资产负债表有多强?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Gogo had liabilities of US$72.0m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$668.8m due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$162.3m and US$73.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$505.1m.

根据上次报告的资产负债表,Gogo在12个月内到期的负债为7,200万美元,12个月以后到期的负债为6.688亿美元。另一方面,它有1.623亿美元的现金和价值7,340万美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总额5.051亿美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because Gogo is worth US$1.13b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

这种赤字还不错,因为Gogo的价值为11.3亿美元,因此,如果需要,可能会筹集足够的资金来支撑其资产负债表。但很明显,我们一定要仔细研究它能否在不稀释的情况下管理债务。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们使用两个主要比率来告知我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),第二个是其利息和税前收益(EBIT)覆盖其利息支出(或简称利息保障)的多少倍。这样,我们既考虑债务的绝对数量,也考虑为债务支付的利率。

Gogo has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.1 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 4.8 times. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Unfortunately, Gogo's EBIT flopped 13% over the last four quarters. If that sort of decline is not arrested, then the managing its debt will be harder than selling broccoli flavoured ice-cream for a premium. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Gogo can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Gogo的债务与息税折旧摊销前利润的比率为3.1,其息税前利润覆盖了利息支出的4.8倍。这表明,尽管债务水平很高,但我们不会称其为有问题。不幸的是,Gogo的息税前利润在过去四个季度中下降了13%。如果这种下降得不到遏制,那么管理债务将比以溢价出售西兰花味的冰淇淋更难。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定Gogo能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, Gogo's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最后,公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,不能用会计利润偿还债务。因此,我们显然需要研究息税前利润是否会带来相应的自由现金流。在过去三年中,Gogo的自由现金流占其息税前利润的43%,低于我们的预期。在偿还债务方面,这并不好。

Our View

我们的观点

We'd go so far as to say Gogo's EBIT growth rate was disappointing. But at least its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is not so bad. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Gogo stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Gogo .

我们甚至可以说Gogo的息税前利润增长率令人失望。但至少它将息税前利润转换为自由现金流还不错。从资产负债表来看,考虑到所有这些因素,我们确实认为债务使Gogo的股票有点风险。有些人喜欢这种风险,但我们注意到了潜在的陷阱,因此我们可能更希望它承担较少的债务。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。为此,你应该注意我们在Gogo中发现的3个警告信号。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

归根结底,通常最好将注意力集中在没有净负债的公司身上。您可以访问我们的此类公司的特别名单(所有公司都有利润增长记录)。它是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发