share_log

Wynn Resorts, Limited (NASDAQ:WYNN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 62%

Wynn Resorts, Limited (NASDAQ:WYNN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 62%

永利渡假村有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:WYNN)是持有62%的机构投资者的最爱
Simply Wall St ·  04/24 09:25

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Wynn Resorts' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高机构所有权意味着永利度假村的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 50% 的业务由前 13 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

A look at the shareholders of Wynn Resorts, Limited (NASDAQ:WYNN) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看永利渡假村有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:WYNN)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为62%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Wynn Resorts, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究永利度假村的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:WYNN Ownership Breakdown April 24th 2024
纳斯达克GS:永利所有权明细 2024年4月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wynn Resorts?

关于永利渡假村,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Wynn Resorts already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Wynn Resorts' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

永利渡假村已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看永利度假村的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:WYNN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
纳斯达克GS:永利2024年4月24日收益和收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Wynn Resorts. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.7%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.5% and 6.2% of the stock.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。对冲基金在永利渡假村的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有权为9.7%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.5%和6.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现排名前13位的合计持有该公司的50%所有权,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Wynn Resorts

永利渡假村的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Wynn Resorts, Limited. It has a market capitalization of just US$11b, and insiders have US$1.7b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有永利渡假村有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为110亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值17亿美元的股票。这非常重要。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Wynn Resorts. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有永利渡假村23%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Wynn Resorts has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are concerning) we think you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。以风险为例,永利渡假村有4个警告标志(其中2个令人担忧),我们认为你应该知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发