share_log

C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) Market Cap Touched US$2.6b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) Market Cap Touched US$2.6b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

C3.ai, Inc. 's(纽约证券交易所代码:AI)上周市值触及26亿美元,这使持有45%的散户投资者和机构都受益
Simply Wall St ·  04/23 07:14

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over C3.ai by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Insiders own 11% of C3.ai
  • 散户投资者对 C3.ai 的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 前 25 名股东拥有公司 47% 的股份
  • 内部人士拥有 C3.ai 11% 的股份

If you want to know who really controls C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了 C3.ai, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:AI),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是散户投资者,准确地说约为45%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$2.6b last week, while institutions who own 42% also benefitted.

上周市值触及26亿美元后,散户投资者涨幅最大,而持有42%的机构也从中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about C3.ai.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于 C3.ai 的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AI Ownership Breakdown April 23rd 2024
纽约证券交易所:人工智能所有权明细 2024年4月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?

关于 C3.ai,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that C3.ai does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of C3.ai, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,C3.ai 确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看 C3.ai 过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AI Earnings and Revenue Growth April 23rd 2024
纽约证券交易所:人工智能收益和收入增长 2024年4月23日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in C3.ai. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.5% of shares outstanding. With 7.8% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Thomas Siebel and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Thomas Siebel, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

对冲基金在 C3.ai 中的股票不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已发行股份为8.5%。托马斯·西贝尔和贝莱德公司分别拥有7.8%和5.5%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。第二大股东托马斯·西贝尔也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of C3.ai

C3.ai 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of C3.ai, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$288m stake in this US$2.6b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看来内部人士拥有 C3.ai, Inc. 的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项26亿美元的业务中拥有2.88亿美元的大量股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司45%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以使政策决定对他们有利,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand C3.ai better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that C3.ai is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是为了更好地理解 C3.ai,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,C3.ai 在我们的投资分析中显示了 4 个警告信号,其中 1 个对我们来说不太合适...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发