share_log

After the Recent Decline, Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH) Top Key Executive Jingbo Wang's Holdings Have Lost 9.3% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH) Top Key Executive Jingbo Wang's Holdings Have Lost 9.3% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之后,诺亚控股有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:NOAH)的高层管理人员王静波的控股已经损失了9.3%的价值
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 10:38

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Noah Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • 37% of Noah Holdings is held by Institutions
  • 内部人士似乎对诺亚控股的增长有既得利益,从他们庞大的所有权可以看出
  • 共有5名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 诺亚控股37%的股份由机构持有

If you want to know who really controls Noah Holdings Limited (NYSE:NOAH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 38% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着诺亚控股有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:NOAH),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人内部人士,准确地说约为38%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$81m.

结果,在市值下降8100万美元之后,内部人士作为一个整体遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Noah Holdings.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于诺亚控股的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NOAH Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
纽约证券交易所:诺亚所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Noah Holdings?

关于诺亚控股,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Noah Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Noah Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者持有诺亚控股的相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到诺亚控股的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NOAH Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
纽约证券交易所:NOAH 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 17 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 10% of Noah Holdings. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Noah Holdings' case, its Top Key Executive, Jingbo Wang, is the largest shareholder, holding 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.4% of the stock. In addition, we found that Zhe Yin, the CEO has 5.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

我们的数据显示,对冲基金拥有诺亚控股10%的股份。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。因为行动胜于雄辩,所以我们认为当内部人士拥有公司的大量股份时,这是一个好兆头。就诺亚控股而言,其最高主要高管王静波是最大股东,持有21%的已发行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约10%和9.4%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官尹哲以其名义分配了5.2%的股份。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即该公司约有51%的股份由前五名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Noah Holdings

诺亚控股的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Noah Holdings Limited. Insiders have a US$316m stake in this US$842m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有诺亚控股有限公司的大量股份。业内人士在这笔8.42亿美元的业务中持有3.16亿美元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Noah Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

诺亚控股拥有16%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对诺亚控股有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Noah Holdings you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了诺亚控股的两个警告信号,你应该注意了。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发