share_log

Institutions Along With Individual Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InTellgen Corporation (SZSE:300642) Come Under Pressure; Lose 17% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Individual Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InTellgen Corporation (SZSE:300642) Come Under Pressure; Lose 17% of Holdings Value

持有大量股票的机构及个人投资者面临压力;损失持股价值的17%
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 02:35

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Tellgen by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders own 20% of Tellgen
  • 个人投资者对Tellgen的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 前8名股东拥有公司52%的股份
  • 内部人士拥有Tellgen20%的股份

Every investor in Tellgen Corporation (SZSE:300642) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Tellgen Corporation(深圳证券交易所代码:300642)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人投资者,准确地说约为43%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

While institutions who own 27% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥2.1b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

尽管上周市值跌至21亿元人民币后,持有27%的机构承受了压力,但个人投资者遭受的损失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Tellgen.

在下图中,我们放大了Tellgen的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300642 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SZSE: 300642 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tellgen?

关于Tellgen,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Tellgen already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tellgen's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Tellgen已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Tellgen的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300642 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
SZSE: 300642 2024年4月17日收益和收入增长

Tellgen is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jian Er Yao with 20% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Lingfei Group Co., Ltd. and UBS Asset Management AG are the second and third largest shareholders.

Tellgen 不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官姚健儿,其已发行股份的20%。凌飞集团有限公司和瑞银资产管理股份公司分别拥有7.4%和5.1%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前8名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Tellgen

Tellgen 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Tellgen Corporation. Insiders own CN¥423m worth of shares in the CN¥2.1b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

内部人士似乎拥有Tellgen公司的很大一部分股份。内部人士拥有这家21亿元人民币公司价值4.23亿元人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 43% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Tellgen. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Tellgen拥有43%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对Tellgen有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 9.4%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司9.4%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tellgen better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Tellgen , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Tellgen,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向Tellgen确定了两个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发