share_log

LC Logistics, Inc.'s (HKG:2490) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Xin Xu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 116% Gain

LC Logistics, Inc.'s (HKG:2490) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Xin Xu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 116% Gain

LC Logistics, Inc. 's (HKG: 2490) 最看涨的内幕人士,首席执行官徐欣一定对最近116%的涨幅感到满意
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 18:30

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over LC Logistics implies vested interests in company growth
  • 55% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 对LC Logistics的重大内部控制意味着公司增长中的既得利益
  • 55% 的业务由前三名股东持有
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

To get a sense of who is truly in control of LC Logistics, Inc. (HKG:2490), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了LC Logistics, Inc.(HKG: 2490),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集团是内部人士,准确地说是45%左右。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$1.8b last week.

显然,上周该公司的市值上涨了18亿港元之后,内部人士受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of LC Logistics.

在下图中,我们放大了LC Logistics的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2490 Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
SEHK: 2490 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LC Logistics?

关于LC物流,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司通常缺少机构投资者,但是没有机构投资者的大公司并不常见。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. LC Logistics might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

机构为何不拥有股票,有多种解释。最常见的情况是,公司相对于所管理的资金来说规模太小,因此该机构不愿仔细研究该公司。或者,该公司的某些方面可能使机构投资者望而却步。LC Logistics可能没有机构想要的那种过去的业绩,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2490 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
SEHK: 2490 2024年4月16日收益和收入增长

LC Logistics is not owned by hedge funds. With a 29% stake, CEO Xin Xu is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 11%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yan Li is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

LC Logistics不归对冲基金所有。首席执行官徐欣持有29%的股份,是最大股东。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的15%和11%。有趣的是,第二大股东李燕也是高级主要高管,这再次表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前三名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of LC Logistics

LC物流的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of LC Logistics, Inc.. Insiders own HK$779m worth of shares in the HK$1.7b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

内部人士似乎拥有LC Logistics, Inc.的很大一部分股份。内部人士拥有这家17亿港元公司价值7.79亿港元的股份。我们可以说这表明了与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小;一些内部人士可能已经创立了该公司。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司45%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 11%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据表明,私营公司持有该公司11%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司感兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand LC Logistics better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - LC Logistics has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解LC Logistics,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例-LC Logistics 有 1 个警告标志,我们认为您应该注意。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,来看看这份有趣的公司的免费清单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发