share_log

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE:SLQT) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 18% Decrease

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE:SLQT) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 18% Decrease

在上周下跌18%之后,控制SelectQuote, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:SLQT)很大一部分股权的散户投资者和机构都必须感到沮丧
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 06:08

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over SelectQuote by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 47% ownership
  • Institutions own 37% of SelectQuote
  • 散户投资者对SelectQuote的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 共有25名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为47%
  • 机构拥有SelectQuote37%的股份

Every investor in SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE:SLQT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

SelectQuote, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:SLQT)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为45%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 18% price drop, institutions with their 37% holdings also suffered.

尽管在上周股价下跌18%之后,散户投资者的持股量受到打击,但持有37%的机构也遭受了损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SelectQuote.

在下图中,我们放大了SelectQuote的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SLQT Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SLQT 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SelectQuote?

关于SelectQuote,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

SelectQuote already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SelectQuote, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

SelectQuote的股票登记处已经有机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看一下SelectQuote过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SLQT Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SLQT 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 16 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in SelectQuote. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Brookside Equity Partners LLC with 9.3% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.2% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Timothy Danker directly holds 1.1% of the total shares outstanding.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对SelectQuote进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Brookside Equity Partners LLC,其已发行股份占9.3%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的6.2%和4.7%。此外,该公司首席执行官蒂莫西·丹克直接持有已发行股份总额的1.1%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of SelectQuote

SelectQuote 的内部所有

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in SelectQuote, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$26m worth of the US$289m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有SelectQuote, Inc.的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值2.89亿美元的公司价值2600万美元。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 45% stake in SelectQuote. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有SelectQuote45%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 9.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司拥有9.3%的所有权,可以在制定以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand SelectQuote better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for SelectQuote you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地理解 SelectQuote,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的SelectQuote的3个警告信号,其中一个不容忽视。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发