share_log

Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPEN) Institutional Investors Lost 15% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Opendoor Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OPEN) Institutional Investors Lost 15% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Opendoor 科技公司's(纳斯达克股票代码:OPEN)机构投资者上周下跌了15%,但受益于长期涨势
Simply Wall St ·  04/11 09:56

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Opendoor Technologies' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构所有权居高不下意味着Opendoor Technologies的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前12名股东拥有公司51%的股份
  • 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 61% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Opendoor Technologies Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:OPEN),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为61%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 15% last week. Still, the 38% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投资亏损是任何股东都不喜欢的事情,更不用说上周持股价值下降15%的机构投资者了。尽管如此,38%的一年期涨幅可能有助于减轻他们的总体亏损。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Opendoor Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Opendoor Technologies的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OPEN Ownership Breakdown April 11th 2024
纳斯达克GS:2024年4月11日的开放所有权明细

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Opendoor Technologies?

关于Opendoor Technologies,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Opendoor Technologies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Opendoor Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Opendoor Technologies确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Opendoor Technologies过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OPEN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 11th 2024
纳斯达克GS:2024年4月11日的公开收益和收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Opendoor Technologies. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Access Industries, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.9% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.5% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Carrie Wheeler is the owner of 2.4% of the company's shares.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。对冲基金在Opendoor Technologies中持有的股票不多。我们的数据显示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股东,已发行股份的13%。Access Industries, Inc.是第二大股东,拥有7.9%的普通股,贝莱德公司持有该公司约7.5%的股份。此外,首席执行官嘉莉·惠勒是该公司2.4%股份的所有者。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前12名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Opendoor Technologies

Opendoor 科技的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Opendoor Technologies Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$107m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有Opendoor Technologies Inc.的股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值1.07亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司26%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 7.9%, of the Opendoor Technologies stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看来私营公司拥有Opendoor Technologies股票7.9%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Opendoor Technologies , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。我们已经确定了Opendoor Technologies的3个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发