share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Couchbase, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BASE) Recent US$54m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Couchbase, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BASE) Recent US$54m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构所有者可能会忽略Couchbase, Inc.”s(纳斯达克股票代码:BASE)由于长期利润保持增长,最近市值下降了5400万美元
Simply Wall St ·  04/11 08:39

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Couchbase's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Couchbase的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为53%
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls Couchbase, Inc. (NASDAQ:BASE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 63% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Couchbase, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:BASE),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为63%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.3b last week. Still, the 70% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上周该公司的市值跌至13亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。尽管如此,70%的一年期涨幅可能有助于减轻他们的总体亏损。但是他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Couchbase.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Couchbase的什么。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:BASE Ownership Breakdown April 11th 2024
NASDAQGS:基础所有权明细 2024年4月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Couchbase?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Couchbase的哪些信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Couchbase already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Couchbase, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Couchbase已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Couchbase过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:BASE Earnings and Revenue Growth April 11th 2024
纳斯达克GS:2024年4月11日的基本收益和收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 5.1% of Couchbase shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 6.2% of the stock.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。看来对冲基金拥有Couchbase5.1%的股份。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股东,已发行股份为7.7%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约6.3%和6.2%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更多挖掘,发现10名最大股东约占注册人数的53%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Couchbase

Couchbase 的内部人士所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Couchbase, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$11m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有Couchbase, Inc.不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值1100万美元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Couchbase. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有13%的所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Couchbase有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Couchbase. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司持有Couchbase18%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Couchbase better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Couchbase , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Couchbase,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向Couchbase确定了两个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发