share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK) With 43% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK) With 43% Ownership

机构投资者对拥有43%所有权的Talkspace, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:TALK)大加赞赏
Simply Wall St ·  04/10 07:52

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Talkspace's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高机构所有权意味着Talkspace的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有12名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Talkspace, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:TALK),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有43%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Last week's 9.2% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 429% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周9.2%的涨幅意味着,尽管该公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。目前,一年期股东回报率为429%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Talkspace, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Talkspace的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:TALK Ownership Breakdown April 10th 2024
NASDAQCM:2024年4月10日讨论所有权明细

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Talkspace?

关于Talkspace,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Talkspace does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Talkspace, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Talkspace确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看Talkspace过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:TALK Earnings and Revenue Growth April 10th 2024
NasdaqCM:2024年4月10日Talk收益和收入增长

It looks like hedge funds own 6.7% of Talkspace shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is NVP Associates, LLC with 8.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Jon Cohen, the CEO has 1.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

看来对冲基金拥有Talkspace6.7%的股份。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是非常活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是NVP Associates, LLC,其已发行股份占8.7%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约6.7%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有5.1%的所有权。此外,我们发现首席执行官乔恩·科恩以其名义分配了1.4%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数字就会发现,前12名股东的总所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of Talkspace

Talkspace 的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Talkspace, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$32m worth of the US$630m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有Talkspace, Inc.的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值6.3亿美元的公司价值3200万美元。很高兴看到内部人士进行一些投资,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Talkspace. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Talkspace32%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Talkspace. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股权公司持有Talkspace14%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资本并将其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Talkspace better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Talkspace that you should be aware of before investing here.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Talkspace,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了Talkspace的1个警告信号,在这里投资之前你应该注意这个信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发