share_log

Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HOOD) Institutional Investors Lost 5.2% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HOOD) Institutional Investors Lost 5.2% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's(纳斯达克股票代码:HOOD)机构投资者上周下跌5.2%,但受益于长期涨势
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 11:45

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Robinhood Markets' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高机构所有权意味着Robinhood Markets的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有10位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,拥有52%的所有权
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了Robinhood Markets, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:HOOD),了解该业务的所有权结构很重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有50%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 5.2% in value last week. However, the 84% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降5.2%的机构投资者。但是,84%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Robinhood Markets.

在下图中,我们放大了罗宾汉市场的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HOOD Ownership Breakdown April 8th 2024
NASDAQGS:HOOD 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Robinhood Markets?

关于罗宾汉市场,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Robinhood Markets already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Robinhood Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

罗宾汉市场已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Robinhood Markets过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HOOD Earnings and Revenue Growth April 8th 2024
NASDAQGS: HOOD 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 8 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Robinhood Markets is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that Baiju Bhatt, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 7.6%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.8% and 6.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Vladimir Tenev is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。罗宾汉市场不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,同时也是该公司最高主要高管的百居·巴特持有的股票数量最多,为7.6%。当内部人士持有公司大量股票时,投资者认为这是一个积极的信号,因为这表明内部人士愿意将自己的财富绑定在公司的未来中。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约6.8%和6.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股东弗拉基米尔·特内夫也是董事会主席,这再次表明该公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了进一步的挖掘,发现10名顶级股东约占登记册的52%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,因此在某种程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Robinhood Markets

罗宾汉市场的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Robinhood Markets, Inc.. Insiders own US$2.4b worth of shares in the US$16b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Robinhood Markets, Inc.的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家价值160亿美元的公司价值24亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Robinhood Markets. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有罗宾汉市场22%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 13%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司拥有13%的所有权,可以在制定以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Robinhood Markets that you should be aware of before investing here.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了Robinhood Markets的1个警告信号,在这里投资之前,您应该注意这一点。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发