share_log

Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 19% If They Invested Three Years Ago

Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 19% If They Invested Three Years Ago

Open Text(纳斯达克股票代码:OTEX)投资者如果在三年前进行投资,将损失19%
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 11:22

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But in any portfolio, there are likely to be some stocks that fall short of that benchmark. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ:OTEX) shareholders, since the share price is down 24% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 20%.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超过市场指数基金的回报。但是在任何投资组合中,都可能有一些股票未达到该基准。不幸的是,Open Text Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:OTEX)的长期股东就是这种情况,因为股价在过去三年中下跌了24%,远低于20%左右的市场回报率。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

考虑到这一点,值得一看公司的基本面是否是长期业绩的驱动力,或者是否存在一些差异。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。通过比较每股收益(EPS)和一段时间内的股价变化,我们可以了解投资者对公司的态度是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。

Although the share price is down over three years, Open Text actually managed to grow EPS by 13% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

尽管股价在三年内下跌,但在此期间,Open Text实际上每年设法将每股收益增长13%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。或者,过去的增长预期可能不合理。

Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

由于每股收益的变化似乎与股价的变化无关,因此值得一看其他指标。

We note that, in three years, revenue has actually grown at a 17% annual rate, so that doesn't seem to be a reason to sell shares. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Open Text more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

我们注意到,在三年内,收入实际上以17%的年增长率增长,因此这似乎不是出售股票的理由。这种分析只是敷衍了事,但可能值得对Open Text进行更仔细的研究,因为有时股票会不公平地下跌。这可能带来机会。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

公司的收入和收益(随着时间的推移)如下图所示(点击查看确切数字)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OTEX Earnings and Revenue Growth April 8th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:OTEX 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 8 日

We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Open Text

我们认为,内部人士在去年进行了大量收购,这是积极的。话虽如此,大多数人认为收益和收入增长趋势是更有意义的业务指南。这份显示分析师预测的免费报告应该可以帮助您在Open Text上形成视图

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Open Text, it has a TSR of -19% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

除了衡量股价回报率外,投资者还应考虑股东总回报率(TSR)。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司来说,股东总回报率通常远高于股价回报率。就开放文本而言,在过去3年的股东回报率为-19%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。而且,猜测股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧是没有好处的!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

Open Text shareholders are up 0.6% for the year (even including dividends). But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, the longer term returns (running at about 1.6% a year, over half a decade) look better. It's quite possible the business continues to execute with prowess, even as the share price gains are slowing. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Open Text is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...

Open Text股东今年上涨了0.6%(甚至包括股息)。但这低于市场平均水平。好的一面是,长期回报率(超过五年,每年约1.6%)看起来更好。尽管股价上涨放缓,但该业务很有可能继续保持强劲的执行力。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。即便如此,请注意,Open Text在我们的投资分析中显示了5个警告信号,其中一个对我们来说并不太合适...

Open Text is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

Open Text并不是内部人士唯一买入的股票。对于那些喜欢寻找获利投资的人来说,这份最近有内幕收购的成长型公司的免费清单可能就是入场券。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发