share_log

With 83% Institutional Ownership, Stepan Company (NYSE:SCL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 83% Institutional Ownership, Stepan Company (NYSE:SCL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

Stepan Company(纽约证券交易所代码:SCL)拥有 83% 的机构所有权,是大公司中的最爱
Simply Wall St ·  04/05 08:53

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stepan's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Stepan的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有6位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

If you want to know who really controls Stepan Company (NYSE:SCL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Stepan Company(纽约证券交易所代码:SCL),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为83%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,投资于公司的机构资金中有很大一部分通常是对公司未来的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stepan.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于 Stepan 的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SCL Ownership Breakdown April 5th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SCL 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stepan?

机构所有权告诉我们关于 Stepan 的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stepan. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stepan, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者持有Stepan的大量股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Stepan过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SCL Earnings and Revenue Growth April 5th 2024
纽约证券交易所:SCL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 5 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stepan. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 16%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 9.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Stepan进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是贝莱德公司,所有权为16%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的11%和9.1%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前六名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Stepan

Stepan 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Stepan Company. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$115m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Stepan Company的部分股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约1.15亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司11%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Stepan better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Stepan is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地理解 Stepan,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,Stepan在我们的投资分析中显示了4个警告信号,您应该知道...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发