share_log

FibroGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:FGEN) Latest 43% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

FibroGen, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:FGEN) Latest 43% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

FibroGen, Inc. 's(纳斯达克股票代码:FGEN)最近43%的跌幅增加了一年的亏损,机构投资者可能会考虑采取严厉措施
Simply Wall St ·  04/04 09:56

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in FibroGen implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 机构对FibroGen的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有8名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 内部人士最近一直在买入

If you want to know who really controls FibroGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:FGEN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 62% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着FibroGen, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:FGEN),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为62%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$145m last week after a 43% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 92% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell FibroGen which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上周该公司的市值在股价下跌43%后跌至1.45亿美元,因此机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。这组投资者可能特别担心当前的亏损,这加剧了股东一年的亏损92%。也被称为 “智能货币”,机构对股票价格的走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果继续下跌,机构投资者可能会被迫出售FibroGen,这可能会伤害个人投资者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FibroGen.

在下图中,我们放大了FibroGen的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FGEN Ownership Breakdown April 4th 2024
NASDAQGS: FGEN 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FibroGen?

关于FibroGen,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

FibroGen already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see FibroGen's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

FibroGen已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到FibroGen的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FGEN Earnings and Revenue Growth April 4th 2024
纳斯达克GS:FGEN 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 4 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 9.9% of FibroGen shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is PRIMECAP Management Company, with ownership of 15%. Armistice Capital LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 9.9% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.3% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。看来对冲基金拥有FibroGen9.9%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。该公司的最大股东是PRIMECAP管理公司,所有权为15%。停战资本有限责任公司是第二大股东,拥有9.9%的普通股,贝莱德公司持有该公司约7.3%的股份。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前8名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of FibroGen

FibroGen 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in FibroGen, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$1.5m worth of stock in the US$145m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有FibroGen, Inc.的股份。内部人士以自己的名义拥有这家价值1.45亿美元的公司价值150万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的一致性,但我们通常希望看到更多的内部持股。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司22%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 5.0% stake in FibroGen. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有FibroGen5.0%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for FibroGen (3 are concerning) that you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了FibroGen的5个警告信号(其中3个令人担忧),你应该注意这些信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发