share_log

While Institutions Own 33% of Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 47% Ownership

While Institutions Own 33% of Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 47% Ownership

虽然机构拥有怡和控股有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:J36)33%的股份,但散户投资者是其最大股东,拥有47%的所有权
Simply Wall St ·  04/03 19:18

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Jardine Matheson Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
  • Institutions own 33% of Jardine Matheson Holdings
  • 散户投资者对怡和控股的大量所有权表明,他们在管理和业务战略方面共同拥有更大的发言权
  • 50% 的业务由前 22 名股东持有
  • 机构拥有怡和控股33%的股份

Every investor in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

怡和控股有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:J36)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为47%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 33% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.

另一方面,机构占公司股东的33%。一般而言,随着公司的发展,机构将增加其所有权。相反,内部人士通常会随着时间的推移减少其所有权。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jardine Matheson Holdings.

在下图中,我们放大了怡和控股的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:J36 Ownership Breakdown April 3rd 2024
新加坡证券交易所:J36 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jardine Matheson Holdings?

关于怡和控股,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Jardine Matheson Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jardine Matheson Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,怡和控股确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看怡和控股的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:J36 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 3rd 2024
新加坡证券交易所:J36 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 3 日

Jardine Matheson Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Butterfield Asset Management Ltd., with ownership of 13%. With 13% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, 1947 Trust and First Eagle Investment Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

怡和控股不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是巴特菲尔德资产管理有限公司,所有权为13%。1947年信托和第一鹰投资管理有限责任公司分别拥有13%和5.1%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记处,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前22名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东在所有权中拥有多数权益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Jardine Matheson Holdings

怡和控股的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited. Insiders own US$741m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有怡和控股有限公司的股份。内部人士拥有价值7.41亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in Jardine Matheson Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有怡和控股47%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Jardine Matheson Holdings stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎拥有怡和控股13%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Jardine Matheson Holdings has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例——怡和控股有两个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发