share_log

Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 70% of the Company

Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 70% of the Company

Samsonite International S.A.(HKG: 1910)主要由拥有公司70%股份的机构股东控制
Simply Wall St ·  04/01 18:31

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Samsonite International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 高机构所有权意味着新秀丽国际的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 51% 的业务由前 14 名股东持有
  • 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Samsonite International S.A. (HKG:1910), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了新秀丽国际有限公司(HKG: 1910),了解企业的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有70%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,投资于公司的机构资金中有很大一部分通常是对公司未来的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Samsonite International.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于新秀丽国际的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1910 Ownership Breakdown April 1st 2024
SEHK: 1910 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Samsonite International?

关于新秀丽国际,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Samsonite International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Samsonite International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

新秀丽国际已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司的可观股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过该股,他们喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,它们总会有处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Samsonite International的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总会有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1910 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 1st 2024
SEHK: 1910 年收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 1 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Samsonite International is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Fidelity International Ltd, with ownership of 7.0%. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 6.0% of common stock, and E Fund Management Co., Ltd. holds about 5.1% of the company stock.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。新秀丽国际不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是富达国际有限公司,所有权为7.0%。FMR LLC是第二大股东,拥有6.0%的普通股,易方达管理有限公司持有该公司约5.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前14位的公司合并所有权为51%,这表明没有一个股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Samsonite International

新秀丽国际的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Samsonite International S.A.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth HK$1.8b. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有新秀丽国际股份公司的股份。内部人士持有价值18亿港元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Samsonite International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有新秀丽国际26%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Samsonite International .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在新秀丽国际发现的1个警告标志。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发