share_log

Institutional Investors Must Be Pleased After a 7.1% Gain Last Week That Adds to The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:THG) One-year Returns

Institutional Investors Must Be Pleased After a 7.1% Gain Last Week That Adds to The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:THG) One-year Returns

在上周上涨7.1%之后,机构投资者必须感到高兴,这增加了汉诺威保险集团的利益。”s(纽约证券交易所代码:THG)一年期回报率
Simply Wall St ·  03/31 10:35

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Hanover Insurance Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,汉诺威保险集团的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有13名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 内部人士最近的销售情况

A look at the shareholders of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (NYSE:THG) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看汉诺威保险集团有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:THG)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有87%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 7.1% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 9.0% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

结果,在上周公司股价上涨7.1%之后,机构投资者获得了最大的回报。目前,一年股东回报率为9.0%,上周的涨幅锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hanover Insurance Group, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究汉诺威保险集团的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:THG Ownership Breakdown March 31st 2024
纽约证券交易所:THG 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 31 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hanover Insurance Group?

关于汉诺威保险集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hanover Insurance Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hanover Insurance Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者在汉诺威保险集团拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看汉诺威保险集团的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:THG Earnings and Revenue Growth March 31st 2024
纽约证券交易所:THG收益和收入增长 2024年3月31日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hanover Insurance Group is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.2% and 5.7% of the stock.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。汉诺威保险集团不归对冲基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的10%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.2%和5.7%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前13名股东的合并所有权为51%,这意味着没有一个单一股东拥有多数股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Hanover Insurance Group

汉诺威保险集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$51m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有汉诺威保险集团的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约5100万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司12%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Hanover Insurance Group you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了汉诺威保险集团的两个警告信号,你应该知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发