share_log

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Chengjun Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 26% Last Week

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Chengjun Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 26% Last Week

Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401)首席执行官李成军是最乐观的内部人士,他们的持股量上周增长了26%
Simply Wall St ·  03/29 18:48

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Sprocomm Intelligence implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 2 shareholders own 67% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 对Sprocomm Intelligence的重大内部控制意味着公司增长中的既得利益
  • 前两名股东拥有公司67%的股份
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG:1401), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 67% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。持有公司股份最多的集团是内部人士,准确地说约为67%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$550m last week.

显然,上周该公司的市值上涨了5.5亿港元之后,内部人士受益最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sprocomm Intelligence.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Sprocomm Intelligence的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1401 Ownership Breakdown March 29th 2024
SEHK: 1401 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 29 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sprocomm Intelligence?

关于Sprocomm Intelligence,缺乏机构所有权能告诉我们什么?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司通常缺少机构投资者,但是没有机构投资者的大公司并不常见。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Sprocomm Intelligence might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

公司在股票登记处可能没有任何机构的原因有很多。如果流动性(每天交易的股票数量)低,机构可能很难购买大量股票。如果公司不需要筹集资金,机构可能缺乏建立立场的机会。另一方面,专业投资者总是有可能避开一家公司,因为他们认为这不是赚钱的最佳去处。Sprocomm Intelligence可能没有机构想要的那种过去的业绩,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1401 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 29th 2024
SEHK: 1401 2024年3月29日收益和收入增长

Sprocomm Intelligence is not owned by hedge funds. With a 37% stake, CEO Chengjun Li is the largest shareholder. Bin Xiong is the second largest shareholder owning 31% of common stock, and Jz Capital Limited holds about 6.5% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Bin Xiong is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

Sprocomm Intelligence 不归对冲基金所有。首席执行官李成军持有37%的股份,是最大股东。熊斌是第二大股东,拥有31%的普通股,Jz Capital Limited持有公司约6.5%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股东熊斌也是高级主要高管,这再次表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 67% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,两名最大股东通过其67%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Sprocomm Intelligence

Sprocomm 情报的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Sprocomm Intelligence Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own HK$1.8b worth of shares in the HK$2.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

内部人士似乎拥有Sprocomm Intelligence Limited一半以上的股票。这赋予了他们很大的力量。这意味着他们拥有这家27亿港元公司价值18亿港元的股份。这很有意义。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sprocomm Intelligence. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Sprocomm Intelligence拥有26%的所有权,主要是个人投资者,对Sprocomm Intelligence有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.5%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司6.5%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Sprocomm Intelligence you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了两个你应该注意的Sprocomm Intelligence警告信号。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,来看看这份有趣的公司的免费清单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发