share_log

Earnings Growth of 0.4% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for New China Life Insurance (SHSE:601336) Shareholders

Earnings Growth of 0.4% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for New China Life Insurance (SHSE:601336) Shareholders

5年内0.4%的收益增长不足以转化为新中国人寿保险(SHSE: 601336)股东的正回报
Simply Wall St ·  03/28 21:56

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But in any portfolio, there will be mixed results between individual stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in New China Life Insurance Company Ltd. (SHSE:601336), since the last five years saw the share price fall 49%. Unfortunately the share price momentum is still quite negative, with prices down 8.4% in thirty days. This could be related to the recent financial results - you can catch up on the most recent data by reading our company report.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超过市场指数基金的回报。但是在任何投资组合中,个股之间的结果都会好坏参半。目前,一些股东可能会质疑他们对新华人寿保险股份有限公司(SHSE: 601336)的投资,因为在过去五年中,股价下跌了49%。不幸的是,股价势头仍然相当不利,股价在三十天内下跌了8.4%。这可能与最近的财务业绩有关——您可以通过阅读我们的公司报告来了解最新的数据。

After losing 4.3% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.

在上周下跌4.3%之后,值得调查该公司的基本面,以了解我们可以从过去的表现中推断出什么。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

尽管一些人继续教导高效市场假说,但事实证明,市场是反应过度的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性的。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, New China Life Insurance actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 1.9% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在股价下滑的不幸五年中,新中国人寿保险的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年增长1.9%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。或者,过去的增长预期可能不合理。

Based on these numbers, we'd venture that the market may have been over-optimistic about forecast growth, half a decade ago. Looking to other metrics might better explain the share price change.

基于这些数字,我们敢说,五年前,市场可能对预期的增长过于乐观。看看其他指标可能会更好地解释股价的变化。

The revenue fall of 1.7% per year for five years is neither good nor terrible. But if the market expected durable top line growth, then that could explain the share price weakness.

五年来每年下降1.7%的收入既不好也不糟糕。但是,如果市场预期收入将持续增长,那么这可以解释股价疲软的原因。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下图描述了收入和收入随时间推移而发生的变化(点击图片即可显示确切的数值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601336 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 29th 2024
SHSE: 601336 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 29 日

New China Life Insurance is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. If you are thinking of buying or selling New China Life Insurance stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst consensus estimates for future profits.

新中国人寿保险为投资者所熟知,许多聪明的分析师都试图预测未来的利润水平。如果您正在考虑买入或卖出新中国人寿保险的股票,则应查看这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师对未来利润的共识估计。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, New China Life Insurance's TSR for the last 5 years was -41%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑两者之间的区别 股东总回报 (TSR) 和 股价回报。基于股息再投资的假设,股东总回报率纳入了任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值以及任何股息。可以公平地说,股东总回报率为支付股息的股票提供了更完整的画面。碰巧的是,新华人寿过去5年的股东总回报率为-41%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。而且,猜测股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧是没有好处的!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

It's good to see that New China Life Insurance has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 6.8% in the last twelve months. That's including the dividend. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 7% per year over five years. This makes us a little wary, but the business might have turned around its fortunes. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for New China Life Insurance you should know about.

很高兴看到新华人寿在过去十二个月中向股东提供了6.8%的总股东回报率。这包括股息。毫无疑问,最近的回报远好于五年内每年7%的股东总回报率亏损。这使我们有点警惕,但该企业可能已经扭转了命运。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了你应该知道的新中国人寿保险的1个警告信号。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,请看一下我们预计收益将增加的这份免费公司名单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发