share_log

Olam Group (SGX:VC2) Has No Shortage Of Debt

Olam Group (SGX:VC2) Has No Shortage Of Debt

奥兰集团(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:VC2)不缺债务
Simply Wall St ·  03/27 03:16

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Olam Group Limited (SGX:VC2) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦·巴菲特曾说过一句名言:“波动性远非风险的代名词。”因此,很明显,当你考虑任何给定股票的风险时,你需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务会使公司陷入困境。与许多其他公司一样,奥兰集团有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:VC2)也使用债务。但真正的问题是这笔债务是否使公司面临风险。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务会带来什么风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但是如果企业无法偿还贷款,那么债务就任其摆布。资本主义的组成部分是 “创造性破坏” 过程,在这种过程中,倒闭的企业被银行家无情地清算。尽管这种情况并不常见,但我们经常会看到负债公司永久稀释股东,因为贷款人迫使他们以不良价格筹集资金。当然,许多公司使用债务为增长提供资金,而不会产生任何负面影响。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,要做的第一件事是同时考虑其现金和债务。

What Is Olam Group's Net Debt?

Olam 集团的净负债是多少?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Olam Group had S$15.4b in debt in December 2023; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has S$3.63b in cash leading to net debt of about S$11.8b.

您可以点击下图查看更多详情,该图表显示,奥兰集团在2023年12月的债务为154亿新元;与前一年大致相同。另一方面,它拥有36.3亿新元的现金,净负债约为118亿新元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
SGX:VC2 Debt to Equity History March 27th 2024
新加坡证券交易所:VC2 债券与股本比率历史记录 2024 年 3 月 27 日

How Healthy Is Olam Group's Balance Sheet?

奥拉姆集团的资产负债表有多健康?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Olam Group had liabilities of S$15.5b due within 12 months, and liabilities of S$10.2b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of S$3.63b as well as receivables valued at S$3.34b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total S$18.7b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根据上次报告的资产负债表,Olam集团的负债为155亿新元,12个月后到期的负债为102亿新元。除这些债务外,它有36.3亿新元的现金以及价值33.4亿新元的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总额高出187亿新元。

This deficit casts a shadow over the S$4.16b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Olam Group would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

这一赤字给这家价值41.6亿新元的公司蒙上了阴影,就像一个耸立在凡人之上的巨人。因此,毫无疑问,我们将密切关注其资产负债表。毕竟,如果Olam集团今天必须向债权人付款,则可能需要进行大规模的资本重组。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们通过以下方法来衡量公司的债务负担与其盈利能力:将其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),并计算其利息和税前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的难易程度。这样,我们既考虑债务的绝对数量,也考虑为债务支付的利率。

Olam Group shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (5.2), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 1.4 times the interest expense. The debt burden here is substantial. The good news is that Olam Group improved its EBIT by 5.3% over the last twelve months, thus gradually reducing its debt levels relative to its earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is Olam Group's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

由于息税前利润仅为利息支出的1.4倍,Olam集团的股东面临着净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润比率高(5.2)和利息覆盖率相当薄弱的双重打击。这里的债务负担是沉重的。好消息是,奥兰集团在过去十二个月中将其息税前利润提高了5.3%,从而逐渐降低了相对于收益的债务水平。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识最多。但是,影响未来资产负债表状况的是奥拉姆集团的收益。因此,在考虑债务时,绝对值得一看收益趋势。单击此处查看交互式快照。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Olam Group saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

但是我们最终的考虑因素也很重要,因为公司无法用纸面利润来偿还债务;它需要冷硬现金。因此,我们总是检查息税前利润中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,Olam集团的自由现金流总额为负数。尽管这可能是增长支出的结果,但它确实使债务风险大大增加。

Our View

我们的观点

To be frank both Olam Group's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Olam Group has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Olam Group (of which 2 are a bit concerning!) you should know about.

坦率地说,Olam集团将息税前利润转换为自由现金流及其保持总负债水平的往绩都使我们对其债务水平感到相当不舒服。但至少其息税前利润增长率还不错。考虑到上述所有因素,看来奥拉姆集团的债务太多了。尽管有些投资者喜欢这种冒险的游戏,但这肯定不是我们的好选择。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。这些风险可能很难发现。每家公司都有,我们发现了 Olam Group 的 4 个警告信号(其中 2 个有点令人担忧!)你应该知道。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

毕竟,如果你对一家资产负债表坚如磐石的快速成长型公司更感兴趣,那么请立即查看我们的净现金增长股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发