share_log

PPL (NYSE:PPL) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital

PPL (NYSE:PPL) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital

PPL(纽约证券交易所代码:PPL)可能在分配资本时遇到问题
Simply Wall St ·  03/24 08:56

What financial metrics can indicate to us that a company is maturing or even in decline? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. In light of that, from a first glance at PPL (NYSE:PPL), we've spotted some signs that it could be struggling, so let's investigate.

哪些财务指标可以向我们表明一家公司正在成熟甚至衰落?通常,我们会看到下降 返回 论资本使用率(ROCE)和下降情况 金额 所用资本的比例。基本上,该公司的投资收入减少了,而且总资产也在减少。有鉴于此,乍一看PPL(纽约证券交易所代码:PPL),我们发现了一些可能陷入困境的迹象,所以让我们来调查一下。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

资本使用回报率(ROCE):这是什么?

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for PPL:

对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE是衡量公司年度税前利润(其回报率)的指标,相对于该业务使用的资本。分析师使用以下公式来计算PPL:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

已动用资本回报率 = 息税前收益 (EBIT) ¥(总资产-流动负债)

0.05 = US$1.8b ÷ (US$39b - US$3.3b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).

0.05 = 18亿美元 ÷(390亿美元-33亿美元) (基于截至2023年12月的过去十二个月)

So, PPL has an ROCE of 5.0%. On its own that's a low return on capital but it's in line with the industry's average returns of 4.6%.

因此,PPL的投资回报率为5.0%。这本身就是很低的资本回报率,但与该行业4.6%的平均回报率一致。

roce
NYSE:PPL Return on Capital Employed March 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:PPL 2024年3月24日动用资本回报率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for PPL compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering PPL for free.

上面你可以看到PPL当前的投资回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比如何,但从过去可以看出来的只有那么多。如果你愿意,你可以免费查看分析师对PPL的预测。

What Does the ROCE Trend For PPL Tell Us?

人们的投资回报率趋势告诉我们什么?

We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at PPL. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 8.0% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect PPL to turn into a multi-bagger.

我们对PPL的资本回报率趋势有些担忧。不幸的是,资本回报率已从五年前的8.0%有所下降。最重要的是,值得注意的是,企业内部使用的资本量一直保持相对稳定。这种组合可能表明一家成熟的企业仍有资金部署的领域,但由于新的竞争或利润率降低,获得的回报并不那么高。如果这些趋势继续下去,我们预计PPL不会变成一个多口袋。

The Key Takeaway

关键要点

All in all, the lower returns from the same amount of capital employed aren't exactly signs of a compounding machine. Despite the concerning underlying trends, the stock has actually gained 7.5% over the last five years, so it might be that the investors are expecting the trends to reverse. Regardless, we don't like the trends as they are and if they persist, we think you might find better investments elsewhere.

总而言之,使用相同数量的资本所产生的较低回报并不完全是复利机器的迹象。尽管潜在趋势令人担忧,但该股在过去五年中实际上上涨了7.5%,因此投资者可能预计趋势将逆转。无论如何,我们不喜欢当前的趋势,如果趋势持续下去,我们认为您可能会在其他地方找到更好的投资。

On a final note, we found 3 warning signs for PPL (2 can't be ignored) you should be aware of.

最后,我们发现了你应该注意的 3 个 PPL 警告信号(2 个不容忽视)。

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

如果你想寻找收益丰厚的稳健公司,可以免费查看这份资产负债表良好且股本回报率可观的公司名单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发