share_log

Some May Be Optimistic About Rocky Brands' (NASDAQ:RCKY) Earnings

Some May Be Optimistic About Rocky Brands' (NASDAQ:RCKY) Earnings

有些人可能对洛基品牌(纳斯达克股票代码:RCKY)的收益持乐观态度
Simply Wall St ·  03/23 10:14

Investors were disappointed with the weak earnings posted by Rocky Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:RCKY ). While the headline numbers were soft, we believe that investors might be missing some encouraging factors.

投资者对洛基品牌公司(纳斯达克股票代码:RCKY)公布的疲软收益感到失望。尽管标题数据疲软,但我们认为投资者可能遗漏了一些令人鼓舞的因素。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:RCKY Earnings and Revenue History March 23rd 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:RCKY 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 3 月 23 日

Examining Cashflow Against Rocky Brands' Earnings

根据洛基品牌的收益研究现金流

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

用于衡量公司将其利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的情况的一个关键财务比率是应计比率。简而言之,该比率从净利润中减去FCF,然后将该数字除以该时期公司的平均运营资产。这个比率告诉我们,一家公司的利润中有多少没有自由现金流的支持。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

这意味着负应计比率是一件好事,因为它表明该公司带来的自由现金流比其利润所暗示的要多。虽然应计比率高于零并不令人担忧,但我们确实认为,当公司的应计比率相对较高时,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年发表的一篇论文,“应计额较高的公司将来的利润往往会降低”。

Rocky Brands has an accrual ratio of -0.14 for the year to December 2023. That indicates that its free cash flow was a fair bit more than its statutory profit. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$70m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$10.4m. Rocky Brands' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.

截至2023年12月的一年中,洛基品牌的应计比率为-0.14。这表明其自由现金流远超过其法定利润。实际上,它去年的自由现金流为7000万美元,远远超过其1,040万美元的法定利润。洛基品牌的自由现金流比去年有所改善,总体而言,这是值得期待的。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。

Our Take On Rocky Brands' Profit Performance

我们对洛基品牌利润表现的看法

Rocky Brands' accrual ratio is solid, and indicates strong free cash flow, as we discussed, above. Because of this, we think Rocky Brands' earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! On the other hand, its EPS actually shrunk in the last twelve months. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. To help with this, we've discovered 3 warning signs (2 are a bit unpleasant!) that you ought to be aware of before buying any shares in Rocky Brands.

正如我们在上面讨论的那样,洛基布兰德斯的应计比率很稳定,表明自由现金流强劲。因此,我们认为Rocky Brands的盈利潜力至少和看起来一样好,甚至可能更好!另一方面,其每股收益实际上在过去十二个月中萎缩了。当然,我们只是在分析其收益时才浮出水面;人们还可以考虑利润率、预测增长和投资回报率等因素。请记住,在分析股票时,值得注意所涉及的风险。为了解决这个问题,我们发现了 3 个警告信号(2 个有点不愉快!)在购买洛基品牌的任何股票之前,你应该注意这一点。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Rocky Brands' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

这份报告只研究了阐明洛基布兰德斯利润性质的单一因素。但是,还有很多其他方法可以让你对公司的看法。有些人认为高股本回报率是优质业务的好兆头。因此,你可能希望看到这份免费收藏的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发