share_log

Institutional Investors Are MasterBrand, Inc.'s (NYSE:MBC) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$74m Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are MasterBrand, Inc.'s (NYSE:MBC) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$74m Market Cap Gain

机构投资者是MasterBrand, Inc.”s(纽约证券交易所代码:MBC)最大的博彩玩家在上周市值增长7400万美元后获得了奖励
Simply Wall St ·  03/23 09:59

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in MasterBrand implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构对MasterBrand的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 前十名股东拥有公司51%的股份
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

Every investor in MasterBrand, Inc. (NYSE:MBC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

MasterBrand, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:MBC)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有82%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Last week's 3.2% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 156% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上周3.2%的涨幅意味着,尽管该公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,但机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。目前,一年的投资回报率为156%,上周的收益本来会非常受欢迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MasterBrand.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关MasterBrand的信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MBC Ownership Breakdown March 23rd 2024
纽约证券交易所:MBC 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 23 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MasterBrand?

关于MasterBrand,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that MasterBrand does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MasterBrand's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,MasterBrand确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到MasterBrand的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MBC Earnings and Revenue Growth March 23rd 2024
纽约证券交易所:MBC收益和收入增长 2024年3月23日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 7.2% of MasterBrand shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.1% and 7.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。看来对冲基金拥有MasterBrand7.2%的股份。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和活跃。许多人正在寻找推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。贝莱德公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的16%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的8.1%和7.2%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们做了进一步的挖掘,发现10位大股东约占登记册的51%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of MasterBrand

MasterBrand 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that MasterBrand, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$13m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的信息表明,MasterBrand, Inc.内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员有可能在不拥有太多比例权益的情况下拥有该公司的有意义的权益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约1300万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in MasterBrand. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有MasterBrand10%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with MasterBrand .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在MasterBrand上发现的1个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发