share_log

While Institutions Invested in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) Benefited From Last Week's 6.2% Gain, Private Companies Stood to Gain the Most

While Institutions Invested in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC) Benefited From Last Week's 6.2% Gain, Private Companies Stood to Gain the Most

尽管投资超级集团(SGHC)有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:SGHC)的机构受益于上周6.2%的涨幅,但私营公司的收益将最大
Simply Wall St ·  03/22 10:51

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Super Group (SGHC) indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 66% ownership
  • Institutions own 27% of Super Group (SGHC)
  • 私营公司在超级集团(SGHC)中的大量所有权表明,它们在管理和业务战略中集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 共有2名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为66%
  • 机构拥有超级集团(SGHC)27%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Super Group (SGHC) Limited (NYSE:SGHC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 46% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了超级集团(SGHC)有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:SGHC),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有46%所有权的私营公司。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched US$1.7b last week, while institutions who own 27% also benefitted.

上周市值触及17亿美元后,私营公司涨幅最大,而持有27%的机构也从中受益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Super Group (SGHC), beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究超级集团(SGHC)的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SGHC Ownership Breakdown March 22nd 2024
纽约证券交易所:SGHC 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Super Group (SGHC)?

关于超级集团(SGHC),机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Super Group (SGHC) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Super Group (SGHC)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

超级集团(SGHC)已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到超级集团(SGHC)的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SGHC Earnings and Revenue Growth March 22nd 2024
纽约证券交易所:SGHC收益和收入增长 2024年3月22日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Super Group (SGHC). The company's largest shareholder is Alea Trust, with ownership of 46%. Chivers Trust, Endowment Arm is the second largest shareholder owning 20% of common stock, and Neal Menashe holds about 2.6% of the company stock. Neal Menashe, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对超级集团(SGHC)进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是Alea Trust,其所有权为46%。Chivers Trust、Endowment Arm是第二大股东,拥有20%的普通股,尼尔·梅纳什持有该公司约2.6%的股份。第三大股东尼尔·梅纳什也恰好拥有董事会成员的头衔。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Super Group (SGHC)

超级集团(SGHC)的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

We can see that insiders own shares in Super Group (SGHC) Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$75m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有超级集团(SGHC)有限公司的股份。内部人士持有价值7500万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司23%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 46%, of the Super Group (SGHC) stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

私人公司似乎拥有超级集团(SGHC)46%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Super Group (SGHC) better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Super Group (SGHC) has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解超级群组(SGHC),我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例-Super Group (SGHC) 有 2 个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发