Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology Limited's (HKG:596) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 13% Last Week
Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology Limited's (HKG:596) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 13% Last Week
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 2 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 私营公司在浪潮数字企业技术中的大量所有权表明,它们在管理和业务战略中集体拥有更大的发言权
- 前2名股东拥有公司54%的股份
- 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会
A look at the shareholders of Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology Limited (HKG:596) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看浪潮数字企业技术有限公司(HKG: 596)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为54%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 13% gain.
结果,私营公司是上周13%涨幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关浪潮数字企业技术的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology?
关于浪潮数字企业技术,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
浪潮数字企业技术公司已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到浪潮数字企业技术的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。
Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Inspur Cheeloo Overseas Investment And Development Co., Limited, with ownership of 38%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 3.0% of the stock.
浪潮数字企业技术不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是浪潮Cheeloo海外投资开发有限公司,所有权为38%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约17%和3.0%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 54% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前两名股东通过其54%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。
Insider Ownership Of Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology
浪潮数字企业技术的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们的数据无法证实董事会成员个人持有股份。董事会成员至少没有持有部分个人资产是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。一个不错的下一步是看看这份免费的内幕买入和卖出摘要。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有40%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对浪潮数字企业技术有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 54%, of the Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
私营公司似乎拥有浪潮数字企业技术股票54%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Inspur Digital Enterprise Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例-浪潮数字企业技术有 1 个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。