share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

高露洁棕榄公司(纽约证券交易所代码:CL)拥有83%的股票所有权,主要由机构所有者主导
Simply Wall St ·  03/21 11:14

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Colgate-Palmolive implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构持有高露洁棕榄的大量股权意味着它们对该公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 50% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了高露洁棕榄公司(纽约证券交易所代码:CL),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。机构拥有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Colgate-Palmolive.

在下图中,我们放大了高露洁棕榄的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CL Ownership Breakdown March 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:CL 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Colgate-Palmolive?

机构所有权告诉我们关于高露洁棕榄的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Colgate-Palmolive does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Colgate-Palmolive's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,高露洁棕榄确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看高露洁棕榄的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CL Earnings and Revenue Growth March 21st 2024
纽约证券交易所:CL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 21 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Colgate-Palmolive is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.8% and 5.8% of the stock.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。高露洁棕榄不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已发行股份为9.7%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约6.8%和5.8%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现25位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Colgate-Palmolive

高露洁棕榄的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Colgate-Palmolive Company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$77m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有高露洁棕榄公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值7700万美元的股票。在这种情况下,看看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出可能会更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Colgate-Palmolive. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有高露洁棕榄17%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Colgate-Palmolive better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Colgate-Palmolive you should know about.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解高露洁棕橄榄,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了两个你应该知道的高露洁棕榄警告标志。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发