share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE:TPL) Institutional Owners After Losing 3.7% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE:TPL) Institutional Owners After Losing 3.7% Over the Past Year

在过去一年中下跌3.7%之后,最近的上涨可能会安抚德州太平洋土地公司(纽约证券交易所代码:TPL)的机构所有者
Simply Wall St ·  03/13 07:25

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Texas Pacific Land's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 高机构所有权意味着德州太平洋置地的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 48% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近一直在买入

Every investor in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE:TPL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 61% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

德州太平洋置地公司(纽约证券交易所代码:TPL)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。机构拥有61%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 3.9% increase in the share price after a year of 3.7% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

在经历了3.7%的跌幅之后,机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价上涨3.9%,这表明回报率可能开始呈上升趋势。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Texas Pacific Land.

在下图中,我们放大了德州太平洋置地的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TPL Ownership Breakdown March 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:TPL 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Texas Pacific Land?

关于德州太平洋土地,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Texas Pacific Land. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Texas Pacific Land's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者在德州太平洋地产持有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看德州太平洋置地的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TPL Earnings and Revenue Growth March 13th 2024
纽约证券交易所:2024年3月13日TPL收益和收入增长

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Texas Pacific Land. Our data shows that Horizon Kinetics LLC is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. With 8.3% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。对冲基金在德州太平洋置地的股份不多。我们的数据显示,Horizon Kinetics LLC是最大股东,已发行股份为17%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和贝莱德公司分别拥有8.3%和6.0%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票分布广泛,没有占主导地位的股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Texas Pacific Land

德克萨斯太平洋土地的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Texas Pacific Land Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$15m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,德州太平洋土地公司的内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。由于规模如此之大,我们预计内部人士不会拥有很大一部分股票。他们共拥有1500万美元的股票。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Texas Pacific Land. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

德州太平洋地产拥有39%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对德州太平洋地产拥有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Texas Pacific Land better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解德州太平洋地产,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问这张过去的收益、收入和现金流的交互式图表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发