share_log

Are The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s (NYSE:NAPA) Fundamentals Good Enough to Warrant Buying Given The Stock's Recent Weakness?

Are The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s (NYSE:NAPA) Fundamentals Good Enough to Warrant Buying Given The Stock's Recent Weakness?

是 Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. '鉴于该股最近的疲软,s(纽约证券交易所代码:NAPA)的基本面足够好,足以值得买入?
Simply Wall St ·  03/10 10:57

It is hard to get excited after looking at Duckhorn Portfolio's (NYSE:NAPA) recent performance, when its stock has declined 9.8% over the past week. But if you pay close attention, you might find that its key financial indicators look quite decent, which could mean that the stock could potentially rise in the long-term given how markets usually reward more resilient long-term fundamentals. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Duckhorn Portfolio's ROE today.

看了Duckhorn Portfolio(纽约证券交易所代码:NAPA)最近的表现,很难感到兴奋,当时其股票在过去一周下跌了9.8%。但是,如果你密切关注,你可能会发现其关键财务指标看起来相当不错,考虑到市场通常会奖励更具弹性的长期基本面,这可能意味着该股有可能在长期内上涨。特别是,我们今天将关注达克霍恩投资组合的投资回报率。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

股本回报率或投资回报率是对公司增值和管理投资者资金的有效性的考验。简而言之,它用于评估公司相对于其股权资本的盈利能力。

How Is ROE Calculated?

ROE 是如何计算的?

The formula for return on equity is:

股本回报率的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营业务)÷ 股东权益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Duckhorn Portfolio is:

因此,根据上述公式,达克霍恩投资组合的投资回报率为:

6.8% = US$66m ÷ US$977m (Based on the trailing twelve months to January 2024).

6.8% = 6600万美元 ÷ 9.77亿美元(基于截至2024年1月的过去十二个月)。

The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.07.

“回报” 是企业在过去一年中获得的收入。因此,这意味着其股东每投资1美元,公司就会产生0.07美元的利润。

What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?

投资回报率与收益增长有什么关系?

Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes.

到目前为止,我们已经了解到,投资回报率衡量的是公司创造利润的效率。然后,我们能够评估公司的收益增长潜力,具体取决于公司对这些利润进行再投资或 “保留” 了多少及其有效性。一般而言,在其他条件相同的情况下,股本回报率和利润留存率高的公司的增长率要高于不具有这些属性的公司。

A Side By Side comparison of Duckhorn Portfolio's Earnings Growth And 6.8% ROE

Duckhorn Portfolio的收益增长和6.8%的投资回报率的并排比较

At first glance, Duckhorn Portfolio's ROE doesn't look very promising. Next, when compared to the average industry ROE of 18%, the company's ROE leaves us feeling even less enthusiastic. However, the moderate 17% net income growth seen by Duckhorn Portfolio over the past five years is definitely a positive. We reckon that there could be other factors at play here. For instance, the company has a low payout ratio or is being managed efficiently.

乍一看,达克霍恩投资组合的投资回报率看起来并不十分乐观。接下来,与18%的行业平均投资回报率相比,该公司的投资回报率使我们感到不那么热情。但是,在过去五年中,Duckhorn Portfolio实现了17%的温和净收入增长,这绝对是积极的。我们认为这里可能还有其他因素在起作用。例如,该公司的派息率较低或管理效率很高。

We then compared Duckhorn Portfolio's net income growth with the industry and we're pleased to see that the company's growth figure is higher when compared with the industry which has a growth rate of 7.1% in the same 5-year period.

然后,我们将Duckhorn Portfolio的净收入增长与该行业进行了比较,我们很高兴地看到,与同期5年同期增长率为7.1%的行业相比,该公司的增长数字更高。

past-earnings-growth
NYSE:NAPA Past Earnings Growth March 10th 2024
纽约证券交易所:NAPA过去的收益增长 2024年3月10日

The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. What is NAPA worth today? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether NAPA is currently mispriced by the market.

为公司附加价值的基础在很大程度上与其收益增长息息相关。无论如何,投资者应设法确定预期的收益增长或下降是否已计入其中。然后,这可以帮助他们确定股票是为光明还是暗淡的未来而布局。今天的 NAPA 值多少钱?我们的免费研究报告中的内在价值信息图有助于可视化市场目前是否对NAPA进行了错误的定价。

Is Duckhorn Portfolio Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?

Duckhorn投资组合是否有效地使用了其留存收益?

Given that Duckhorn Portfolio doesn't pay any dividend to its shareholders, we infer that the company has been reinvesting all of its profits to grow its business.

鉴于Duckhorn Portfolio不向其股东支付任何股息,我们推断该公司一直在将其所有利润再投资以发展业务。

Conclusion

结论

Overall, we feel that Duckhorn Portfolio certainly does have some positive factors to consider. Even in spite of the low rate of return, the company has posted impressive earnings growth as a result of reinvesting heavily into its business. On studying current analyst estimates, we found that analysts expect the company to continue its recent growth streak. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.

总体而言,我们认为Duckhorn Portfolio确实有一些积极因素需要考虑。尽管回报率很低,但由于对业务进行了大量再投资,该公司的收益增长令人印象深刻。在研究分析师当前的估计时,我们发现分析师预计该公司将继续保持最近的增长势头。这些分析师的预期是基于对该行业的广泛预期,还是基于公司的基本面?点击此处进入我们分析师对公司的预测页面。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发