share_log

Hla Group Corp., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600398) Market Cap up CN¥3.0b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders

Hla Group Corp., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600398) Market Cap up CN¥3.0b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 47% as Well as Insiders

Hla 集团有限公司s(SHSE: 600398)上周市值上涨了30亿元人民币,这使持有47%的私营公司和内部人士都受益
Simply Wall St ·  03/04 22:21

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Hla Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 66% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Insiders own 26% of Hla Group
  • 私营公司对Hla集团的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 66% 的业务由前两名股东持有
  • 内部人士拥有Hla集团26%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hla Group Corp., Ltd. (SHSE:600398), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了Hla集团有限公司(SHSE: 600398),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为47%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥38b last week, while insiders who own 26% also benefitted.

上周市值触及380亿元人民币后,私营公司涨幅最大,而持有26%的内部人士也从中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hla Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Hla集团的什么。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600398 Ownership Breakdown March 5th 2024
SHSE: 600398 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hla Group?

关于Hla集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hla Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hla Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在Hla集团拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Hla Group的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600398 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 5th 2024
SHSE: 600398 2024 年 3 月 5 日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hla Group. Heilan Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 40% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 25% and 3.7% of the stock.

对冲基金在Hla集团的股份不多。海澜集团股份有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的40%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约25%和3.7%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Hla Group

Hla 集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hla Group Corp., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥9.8b stake in this CN¥38b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Hla集团有限公司合理比例的股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项380亿元的业务中拥有98亿元人民币的大量股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Hla Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Hla集团14%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 47%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据表明,私营公司持有公司47%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私营公司对上市公司的股票感兴趣。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hla Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hla Group .

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Hla集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该注意我们在Hla集团发现的1个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发