share_log

Private Companies Are SJM Holdings Limited's (HKG:880) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$710m

Private Companies Are SJM Holdings Limited's (HKG:880) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$710m

私人公司是澳博控股有限公司(HKG: 880)的最大所有者,在市值下降7.1亿港元后受到打击
Simply Wall St ·  03/03 21:59

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in SJM Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Macau Tourism And Amusement Company Limited with a 55% stake
  • Insiders own 12% of SJM Holdings
  • 私人公司在澳博控股拥有大量所有权,这表明他们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 该公司的最大股东是澳门旅游娱乐有限公司,持有55%的股份
  • 内部人士拥有澳博控股12%的股份

A look at the shareholders of SJM Holdings Limited (HKG:880) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 55% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看澳博控股有限公司(HKG: 880)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有55%所有权的私营公司。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And following last week's 4.0% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.

继上周股价下跌4.0%之后,私营公司遭受的损失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SJM Holdings.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于澳博控股的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:880 Ownership Breakdown March 4th 2024
SEHK: 880 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 4 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SJM Holdings?

关于澳博控股,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SJM Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SJM Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者在澳博控股拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看澳博控股的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:880 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 4th 2024
SEHK: 880 2024 年 3 月 4 日收益和收入增长

SJM Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Macau Tourism And Amusement Company Limited, with ownership of 55%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder. On Kei Leong, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.

澳博控股不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是澳门旅游娱乐有限公司,所有权为55%。由于所有权持有如此巨额的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.1%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有4.5%的所有权。第二大股东安基亮也恰好拥有最高关键高管的头衔。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of SJM Holdings

澳博控股的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of SJM Holdings Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$2.0b stake in this HK$17b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

内部人士似乎拥有澳博控股有限公司的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,内部人士在这项170亿港元的业务中拥有20亿港元的大量股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in SJM Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有澳博控股27%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 55%, of the SJM Holdings stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

私人公司似乎拥有澳博控股55%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中予以披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with SJM Holdings .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该注意我们在澳博控股发现的1个警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发